An owner of land affected by a County Administrative Board decision approving a building plan has a right of appeal against the Board's decision to the Government.   36.

ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique pris en ses deux branches : Attendu, selon l'arrêt déféré (Lyon, 1er mars 2001), que la société Doridant a chargé la société des transports Bonnard

    On an unspecified date the Rzeszów Social Security Board asked the Main Social Security Board’s doctor (Główny Lekarz Orzecznik) to inform it whether the applicant’s son required the permanent

In December 2000 the Banking Regulation and Supervision Board (“the Board”) transferred Demirbank’s management and control to the Savings Deposit Insurance Fund (“the Fund”) on the ground that Demirbank

  On 15   March 1995 the Appeals Board rejected the appeal.

  The Supervisory Board apparently each time refused to recommend the applicant to the Deputy Minister of Justice.

        On 25 June 1992 the Trial Board discontinued the criminal proceedings against the applicant.

By decision of 15   October 2003 the Aliens Appeals Board upheld the decision, adhering to the reasons set out in the Migration Board’s decision.

Agrarsenat - “the Supreme Board”) against the Regional Board's decision. 22.

neuf cent quatre-vingt-seize, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller ROMAN et les conclusions de M. l'avocat général DINTILHAC; Statuant sur le pourvoi formé par : - BONNAIRE

The Parole Board recommended that the applicant should be transferred to open conditions, and that his detention should be reviewed after two years.

    Following the applicant’s appeal, the Appeals Board, on 2 June 1997, quashed the Immigration Board’s decision and referred the case back for re-examination.

    Rejection by the Immigration Appeals Board 16.

His requests were all refused by the Prison Board.

  An owner of land affected by a County Administrative Board decision approving a building plan has a right of appeal against the Board's decision to the Government.

Revenue Board.”

On 12 January 2017 the applicant and X initiated proceedings before the County Social Welfare Board ( Fylkesnemnda for barnevern og sosiale saker ) for reconsideration of the contact rights.

On 26 July 2018 the Administration and Monitoring Board of Bingöl Prison (“the Board”) decided, inter alia , to limit the visiting rights of the detainees pending trial and the persons that were detained

      The applicants complain of a violation of Article 6 of the Convention, since they could not obtain a court examination of the County Administrative Board's decision of 21