font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal } .s619FCD1 { font-family:Arial; list-style-position:inside }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 47353/06 Eduard

    Martin John Edwards 9.     The first applicant was born in 1946 and lives in Woking. 10.

    Martin John Edwards 12.     The first applicant was born in 1946 and lives in Woking. 13.

With regard to the second complaint, the Court of Appeal held that even if there had been a failure to make it clear that the offences were committed outside the United Kingdom, it was quite obvious from

Edwards [1987] 1 WLR 1116 per Bingham LJ). In Reeves v.

The witness’s evidence as a whole makes clear that his answers at interview to Detective Sergeant ... quoted in this judgment were untrue and misleading.

  Both noted that the applicant was displaying clear signs of mental illness.

However, such proof may follow from the co ‑ existence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.

During the shooting there had been a distance of only 15-20 metres between them, so he had had a clear view of the person's face.

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 67385/01 by Edward

:avoid } .sA5E34492 { width:18.86pt; display:inline-block } .sB2998F02 { width:154.72pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 50853/06 by Edvards

Edwards and Mr M. Ford, barristers practising in London. 2.     The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mr D. Walton and Ms R.

Edgard PALLIERES, Conseiller. Ces magistrats ont rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la Cour, composée de : Mme Christine DORSCH, Président de Chambre M.

This procedural obligation is not an obligation as to result but as to means only (see Paul and Audrey Edwards , cited above, § 71). 58.

The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the legislative interference pending judicial proceedings in Italy (see, for example, Arras and Others v.

It follows that the scope of their complaint was already clear at that stage, that is, before their filing of their observations in reply to the Government’s objection on victim status.

It was clear from this decision and also from the critical remarks contained in the decision of 22 September 2005 of the First Deputy Prosecutor General in respect of the Centru police that the investigation

The rest of the conversation is not clear because only Z.’s words are recorded in the transcript, while there is a blank space in respect of the applicant.

There was clear medical evidence that someone had penetrated K on a number of occasions, but the applicant denied that it had been him.