IL EST FAIT GRIEF à l'arrêt attaqué D'AVOIR constaté l'irrecevabilité de l'action engagée contre la compagnie HELI AIR MONACO par Monsieur X... ès-qualités de liquidateur amiable de la société HELI TRANSPORT

    The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

. & SCEG (la société X...) et la société Happy baby étaient membres du Gie Heli plus communication, propriétaire d'un hélicoptère utilisé en commun par les deux sociétés et dont la société Heli technique

The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to determination of civil rights within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human

The court thus held that the fact that the applicant had been taken to hospital in a coma had proven that the authorities had failed to evacuate him on time.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded Mr Ikanga FRF 30,000 for non-pecuniary damage and FRF 1,500 for costs and expenses.

The Court also held, unanimously, that it was not necessary to examine the complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. (The judgment is available only in French.)

The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

Tuncay Kaya was held for 14 days and Özlem Kaya, for four days.

Having noticed that he was being recorded, police officer R. approached the applicant, apparently beat him in front of witnesses, handcuffed him with the help of another police officer, searched him and

  On 23 February 1996 the bench of the Gdansk Regional Court dealing with maritime disputes held that the crew members had been partly responsible, that the vessel's operator had been at fault for

The Court therefore held that the measures in issue had been disproportionate and had infringed the first applicant’s right to freedom of expression.

  Consequently, the Court held that there had been no violation of Article 8.

C / Société HELI PACK SARL MAXI DISTRIBUTION Mireille Y...

The Court held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant ITL 5,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage. (Judgment in French).

A hearing was held in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 5 December 2006 and the application was declared admissible on 6 February 2007.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant ITL   13,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 3,000,000 for costs and expenses.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded him ATS 40,000 for costs and expenses. (Judgment in English)   (4) Löffler v.