AFFAIRE [D] FRANCE C/ [M] [M] ISOL Répertoire Général N° RG 26/00089 - N° Portalis DB26-W-B7K-IXOG Minute N° -------------------------- Expédition exécutoire le : 21/05/2026 à : la selarl LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

France Letienne, demeurant 36, Vallée de Verrières, 37500 Thizay, 58 / de Mme Catherine Linet, demeurant 5, rue Surcouf, 37420 Avoine, 59 / de Mme Brigitte Louet, demeurant "Cuzay", 86120 Roiffe,

le bureau d'aide juridictionnelle de Nouméa) Représentée par Me Céline JOANNOPOULOS de la SARL CJ AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de NOUMEA 07/04/2025 : Copie revêtue de la formule exécutoire - Me LOSTE

The applicant’s parents disagreed with the Department of Border Police’s interpretation of the treaty and initiated a court action in which they claimed pecuniary compensation for their son’s lost opportunity

On 25 November 2009 he received notification that he had lost six points and that his licence had therefore been cancelled, as he had no points left.

In assessing the damage sustained by the applicants, the date on which they had learned with legal certainty that they had lost their right of ownership of the property was to be taken into consideration

    On 14   June 2022 the applicants’ representative informed the Court that he had lost contact with the applicants. THE LAW 8.

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: The first applicant had lost considerably less than half his pension.

The Government argued mainly that the applicant had lost his victim status because he had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013 on the execution

On several occasions the applicant lost consciousness and foamed at the mouth. On 28   December 2009 the applicant was taken to a municipal hospital. The doctor diagnosed her with renal colic.

The Court is of the opinion that the applicant’s failure to inform his representative of his current whereabouts must be taken as indicating that he has lost interest in pursuing his application.

Shortly afterwards the applicants lost all contact with each other and at the time of the European Court’s judgment the first applicant was still unaware of his daughter’s whereabouts.

In May 1996, the Auditor found six individuals (including the applicant) jointly and severally liable for the sum of GBP 31,677,064, being the amount of money lost through their wilful misconduct.

Furthermore, the lost profits for years 1999-2000 amounted, in their submission, to EUR   1,497,186.90, and for the period 2001-04 to EUR   2,495,311.44. 22.

However, he complained that his lost earnings had not been calculated properly. 25.

  Le déroulement de la procédure pénale dont les requérants ont fait l’objet     Le dossier fut confié au juge d’instruction près le tribunal de Lousã.

PARTIES EN CAUSE : Madame [K] [S] née le [Date naissance 5] 1933 à [Localité 10] de nationalité Française [Adresse 8] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Jean-Michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

B..., représenté par Me Louette, demande au juge des référés d’ordonner une expertise sur le fondement de l'article R. 532-1 du code de justice administrative, en présence de la commune de Coisy, en vue

M..., E..., A..., H..., C..., L..., Z..., O..., J..., I..., X..., K..., N..., Y..., Louat, Girin, Thirend, Girardet, Chalimont, Martial, Brodet, Artero, Monloup, Perrot, Garde et au ministre de l'intérieur