secrétariat le 9 septembre 2014, à la suite du refus opposé par la garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice à sa demande de communication des grilles d'évaluation et des barèmes des deux épreuves d'admissibilité

juin 1984 et 3 septembre 1984, et tendant à ce que le Conseil d'Etat annule pour excès de pouvoir la décision du président du jury de l'agrégation de philosophie lui refusant pour la session 1984 l'admissibilité

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

Admissibility 22.

  ADMISSIBILITY OF THE COMPLAINTS OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE A.   General remarks as to the evidence 1.

Conclusion : For the purposes of this admissibility decision, the Court proceeded on the basis of the assumption that the jurisdiction of the respondent State over Crimea was in the form or nature of “

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

He had thereby tried to deceive the Court by presenting a distorted image of the most serious part of his application, which would have prevented the Court from ruling on the admissibility and merits of

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

    According to the Court’s case-law, the question of admissibility where there is possible abuse of the right of individual application under Article   35   §   3   (a)

This approach was followed in many subsequent admissibility decisions; in several decisions the six-month issue was dealt with only briefly or not at all, because the respondent Government had not made

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Continuing situation

    In their written and oral observations, the respondent Government raised a number of objections as to the admissibility of the application.

Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Continuing situation

Revision admitted (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application

    The applicant association and the Government each filed observations on the admissibility and the merits of the case (Rule 59 § 1).