CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

296 résultats pour « contestation deja nee »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001176385

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1989

9 mars 1989

  It is an overall name for an agricultural estate which consists of several registered properties.

Source officielle

Page 15 sur 15

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD003026509

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2014

12 juin 2014

They further contested the audio recording, arguing that there were gaps and interruptions in it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324DEC006712801

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2005

24 mars 2005

On 22 October 1999, the court interpreter who had immediately translated the contents of the indictment, gave a copy to the applicant. A copy was also given to the applicant's counsel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0408DEC001525289

Admin. suprême

8 avril 1991

8 avril 1991

  Gallen Forensic Medicine Institute as to the applicant's blood alcohol concentration.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0130JUD006153608

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2014

30 janvier 2014

    The applicants’ contact with the national authorities 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1212JUD003214110

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2019

12 décembre 2019

    On 23 May 2000 the Fund granted the applicant a retirement pension in the amount of 6,462 denars (MKD) per month.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001176485

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1989

9 mars 1989

  It is an overall name for an agricultural estate which consists of several registered properties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD002518921

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2024

12 septembre 2024

    On 27 March 2015 the Investigating Judge ordered the seizure of a safe deposit box and its contents held at the bank in the applicant’s name.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0827DEC004052410

Admin. suprême

27 août 2013

27 août 2013

The applicants deny having received these two allowances and submit that the job referred to by the Government was never found.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028JUD002834295

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 1999

28 octobre 1999

The applicant’s parents were never informed of the grounds or legal basis for that deprivation of property.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602JUD004595909

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2016

2 juin 2016

    The applicant contested those arguments.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106JUD003493204

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2011

6 janvier 2011

    On the last point, the Constitutional Court observed that citizenship could be granted by way of exception only to persons who had never been Lithuanian citizens.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004485310

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

Lastly, the Terza Istanza Penale noted that the appeal judge had upheld the prosecutor’s objections that there had been nothing new in this application which was therefore inadmissible.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0919JUD001688008

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2013

19 septembre 2013

He further contested the trial court’s finding that the court order of 14   November 2001 had been served on his son.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001176685

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1989

9 mars 1989

  However, the reform should not entail any new obstacles to the formation of fishery conservation areas."

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:1210JUD000760476

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 1982

10 décembre 1982

   On 17 May 1976, the public prosecutor ( procuratore della Repubblica ) of Reggio requested the public prosecutor ( procuratore generale ) attached to the Catanzaro Court of Appeal to apply

Source officielle