In both their appeals and their supplementary submissions, the applicants stated that they wished to rely on the same grounds as the company had in its appeal and supplementary submissions to the court

The applicants complain, under Article 3 of the Convention, that by summarily returning them to Bosnia and Herzegovina, without any assessment of risk they would face in that country, the Croatian authorities

  They further complained, under Article 5, about the Turkish authorities’ refusal to acknowledge their relatives’ detention and that there was no evidence that their relatives had been informed of

The men approached them and ordered them to take everything out of their pockets.

The men approached them and ordered them to take everything out of their pockets.

The bodies were also photographed, both with their clothes on and after they were taken off. The prosecutor and the doctors noted in their report the extensive injuries they observed on the bodies.

  In addition, they claimed that there had been an infringement of their right of property, secured in the Constitution.

There they had removed copper wires and then walked down to a river bank around 30-40 metres away to strip the cable.

The applicants’ trial before the Iraqi High Tribunal started in May 2009 and ended in September 2009 with a verdict cancelling the charges against them and ordering their immediate release.

the decisions of the domestic courts, and asked them to choose the means by which they wanted their property rights in respect of the plot of land of 0.4863 hectares to be restored.

The latter stated that they were unable to identify the persons who had detained them. 47.

The Chechens had then left, taking Mr   U.B. with them. 32.

They were then taken to Eyüp Stadium, along with 1,054 others, where they were again beaten and insulted. Their identity cards, money and valuables were seized by the police officers.

They also pointed out that in the absence of direct evidence, the extent of their involvement in the crimes for which they were prosecuted and in particular the conclusion on the existence of their prior

They asked the Prosecutor to assist them in obtaining the bodies of their relatives.

The applicants and their families then moved to Elazığ where they currently live.

that the conditions do not curtail the rights in question to such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness; that they are imposed in pursuit of a legitimate aim

their diplomas, unless they had paid the requisite schooling fees. 1.5.

Furthermore, in the determination of their civil rights and obligations they were entitled to a fair and public hearing, which had not been afforded to them. 22.

With regard to their health, they maintained that medication was not prescribed on an individual basis, the hospital had no doctor specialising in infectious diseases and there were delays in transferring