NĂSTASĂ against Romania and 8 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 24   February 2022 as a Committee composed of:  

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 37505/24 Tibor CSÉCSEI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

  In the case of János Dániel Szabó v.

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 35970/23 Mihály HAVRAN against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 9551/25 István RÁDAI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

209.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 63983/09 by Gabriele GATTEI against San Marino The European Court of Human Rights

to a court was breached by the excessively formalistic interpretation given by the domestic courts to the legal provisions providing the right of a claimant to be reinstated in the time-limit set for

142.27pt; display:inline-block } .s9B753B46 { width:198.3pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 51827/08 by Teodoro MULARONI against San Marino The European Court of Human Rights

On 29 June 2022 the Constitutional Court found a violation of the applicants’ rights to a hearing within a reasonable time and to respect for their private and family life (II. ÚS 167/2022).

The San Marinese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Lucio Leopoldo Daniele, and their Co-Agent Mr Guido Bellatti Ceccoli.

5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 52591/17 Iulian-George SUŞNESCU against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

; text-align:justify } .s473B62F0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; font-size:13.5pt } DEUXIÈME SECTION DÉCISION FINALE Requête n o 73907/01 présentée par Daniela

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 15512/15 and 36083/15 Daniel

Claudiu MIHĂILĂ against Romania and 2 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 18   June   2015 as a committee composed of: &#xa0

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 11730/21 Daniel