CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 663 résultats pour « Hiesse Rendu »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0111DEC002300893

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1994

11 janvier 1994

Although his return is likely to be enforced by Swedish or Finnish authorities, he considers his removal from Norway as a de facto expulsion, having regard to his previous unsuccessful asylum requests

Page 16 sur 334

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
TJ

JLD

69d4104acdc6046d47555872

T. Judiciaire

4 avril 2026

4 avril 2026

Vous deviez prendre un avion hier au départ de Roissy Charles de Gaulle ? Ce n’est pas vrai. Vous ne deviez pas prendre un avion hier ? Non, ce n’est pas vrai.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC004347098

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2000

6 avril 2000

Moreover, the particular circumstances of the applicant’s case would not render his sentence inhuman treatment or punishment: the applicant pleaded guilty to the serious offence of conspiring to manufacture

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC004909899

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2001

16 janvier 2001

about his place of residence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114DEC003697421

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2023

14 novembre 2023

    Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicant complained before this Court that the order to demolish his house interfered with his right to a home as it was his and his family’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002484194

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1994

30 novembre 1994

His appeal was dismissed. His sentence was reduced by nine months.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD003240713

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2017

10 janvier 2017

Other relevant elements were the specifics of the child’s development, his state of health, his disability, the need for his permanent medical rehabilitation and his heavy dependence on his mother and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5669

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2001

28 juin 2001

However, the detention of a person in a prison at a distance from his family which renders any visit very difficult, if not impossible, may, in exceptional circumstances, constitute an interference with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175516

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2017

19 juin 2017

savings – so as to render the State liable for its losses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC004001398

Admin. suprême

16 avril 1998

16 avril 1998

, namely his unauthorised absence from service, ordered his provisional suspension and a reduction of his salary by 20%.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14148

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2023

11 juillet 2023

Once his national passport had expired his right to leave Serbia could not have been practical and effective without him having the possibility of obtaining a travel document.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1016DEC003281702

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2006

16 octobre 2006

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained in his own and his sons’ names under Articles   8, 6, 1 and 46 of the Convention that the German courts had dismissed his motion to broaden his personal contacts

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Paris

ORTA_2308333_20230414

Administratif

14 avril 2023

14 avril 2023

Les mesures ont été prises notamment au regard des débordements qui ont eu lieu dans la capitale le mois dernier ainsi qu'hier, jeudi 13 avril. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0125DEC000051318

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2022

25 janvier 2022

He was convicted essentially based on the threatening nature of the text messages received by his partner, witness testimonies made by his daughter and his partner, and his own testimony. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126390

Admin. suprême

20 août 2013

20 août 2013

He submitted that eviction would render him homeless and that the State had never offered him any other accommodation, although he had been on the housing waiting list for many years, had worked his entire

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1128DEC000955202

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2002

28 novembre 2002

    The applicant also complains under Article 14 of the Convention that he has been prevented from obtaining compensation for his vehicle due to his Serbian origin. THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD001648010

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2021

11 mai 2021

of his confession statements at his trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1014JUD005981613

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2025

14 octobre 2025

In support of his application, he submitted his baptism certificate and medical documentation relating to his bronchial asthma, together with an affidavit signed by his partner.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC000964409

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

The essence of the Grand Chamber’s judgment was that there had been no violation of the applicant’s rights such as to render his continued detention unlawful.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC005171413

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

front of his publishing company.

Source officielle