xa0;               against Denmark         The European Commission of Human Rights (Second Chamber) sitting

On the same day, sitting as a panel of three members, it dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the fine of ATS 17,000 but modified the time of the accident.

Sillingy Combes, ainsi que le rejet du recours gracieux ; - de mettre à la charge de la commune de Sillingy la somme de 3 000 euros en application des dispositions de l'article L.761-1 du code de justice

Likewise, the decision of Parliament to extend the term of the sitting lay judges was, in the circumstances, fully justified. The only alternative would have been to appoint new lay judges.

    On 24 March 2009 the applicant complained to the President of the Regional Court about the sitting judge, suspecting him of criminal conduct.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir , President ,   Gediminas Sagatys,   Juha Lavapuro , judges ,

On 14 October 1999 the military judge sitting on the bench of the İzmir State Security Court was replaced by a civil judge.

    The Bucharest Regional Military Tribunal, sitting in a panel composed of two colonel-magistrates, examined the case as a first ‑ instance court.

On 28 September 2004 the Court of Appeal, sitting as a three-judge panel presided by Judge G., upheld the judgment of 3 August 2004.

The appeal subsequently lodged by the applicant was upheld by the Regional Court ( rechtbank ) of The Hague, sitting in Amsterdam, on 31 March 2005, which found that the reasoning employed by the Minister

By an interlocutory judgment of 13   August 2014 the pre-trial judge attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice (“the Court of Cassation”) – sitting in chambers and in the absence of the

The applicants’ subsequent appeal was rejected on 11   June   1998 by the Regional   Court ( arrondissementsrechtbank ) of The Hague sitting in ‘s-Hertogenbosch.

    On 14 March 2014 the Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic sitting as a first instance court rejected the applicant’s claim having found that the applicant had been responsible for

width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 15243/04 by Mohamed Youssouf BARAKAT SALEH against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

    On 19 April 2006, 21 July 2006 and 26 September 2006 the authorities explained that by signing the contract with A., the applicant had agreed to pay a part of the apartment’s price, while

xa0;                against Germany        The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting

xa0;               against Germany         The European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber) sitting

  He thirdly requested to hear as witnesses the three surviving members of the crew not heard by the court, in order to prove that the applicant had not caused the sinking of the ship.

; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 23925/13 Bogusława NAPIERAŁA and Jerzy KUBICA against Poland   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting