CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917DEC001383205
17 septembre 2009
    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007007812
11 janvier 2022
those principles (α)   Scope of the relevant law (β)   Availability of an effective remedy (γ)   Conclusion 2.
cr
613725fccd580146774220e8
22 mai 2001
et dissuasif et constitue, donc, une sanction pénale accessoire, est encouru de plein droit lorsqu'est établie la réalité des infractions énumérées à l'article L.11-1 du Code de la route, et ne peut faire
6079a8e59ba5988459c4f2ab
14 juin 2006
de défense avant son renvoi devant le tribunal correctionnel ; qu'eu égard en particulier à la nature des charges articulées contre lui, la Cour devait spécialement rechercher si la situation ainsi faite
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0411REP001899691
11 avril 1996
  ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS   A.    The particular circumstances of the case   19.
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0227REP002323894
27 février 1996
   Les requérants soutiennent, en outre, que le fait de rendre punissables des actes et comportements, qui ne sont que l'exercice élémentaire du droit à la liberté de manifester sa religion,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0121JUD004875411
21 janvier 2014
Moreover, in the two cited cases the Government had in fact pleaded the ordinary courts’ lack of competence. 39.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0706JUD004357798
6 juillet 2005
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0512REP001145485
12 mai 1988
  In any event, only a few of the questions put by the defence were in fact answered.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD002031917
8 octobre 2019
that the confiscated sums had illicit origins – the facts had been established in fair proceedings, where the applicants’ defence rights had been respected.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0524JUD001073784
24 mai 1988
AS TO THE FACTS I.    THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 8.    The first applicant, Josef Felix Müller, a painter born in 1955, lives in St. Gall.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425JUD004169712
25 avril 2017
    The Court’s assessment (a)     General principles 46 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213JUD005963917
13 décembre 2022
On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018DEC002414711
18 octobre 2011
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0405DEC000225764
5 avril 1968
The principal reason was that the Presiding Judge wanted to defer the trial until his retirement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD001603118
9 mars 2021
The courts also underscored that a person’s right to fast proceedings was only a part of the right to a fair trial, and had to be seen in the light of Article   1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD002156613
8 octobre 2015
(b)     Application of the above principles to the present case 58.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615JUD002922603
15 juin 2010
FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1956 and lives in Bucharest. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0520JUD004424120
20 mai 2025
    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. THE DEMONSTRATION 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD001071805
24 avril 2014
drew conclusion if certain fact was established ...
Page 164 sur 195
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.