Romania and Hungary (no. 71099/01, § 70, 5 April 2005); Zorica   Jovanović v. Serbia (no. 21794/08, § 68, ECHR 2013); Kutzner v.   Germany (no.

Pravdo BOJKOVIĆ 11/12/1968 Brother, sister-in-law, two nieces Serbian Železnik, Serbia   Mirka BOJKOVIĆ 27/02/1945 Daughter, son-in-law, three grandchildren Serbian Železnik, Serbia   Ivica JOVANOVIĆ

  15404/15 and 5 others, §§   36-41, 18 June 2019, compare also Zorica Jovanović v.   Serbia , no.   21794/08, § 48, ECHR 2013, and Petrović and Others v. Croatia , nos.

  Serbia , no. 36500/05, § 110, 13 October 2009; see also, mutatis mutandis , Zorica Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 21794/08, § 49, ECHR 2013; Šilih v.

représenté par Me Béatrice HIEST NOBLET de la SCP HYEST et ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P0311 substitué par Me Anne JOVANOVIC, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : A0856

The Court considers that the applicant’s dismissal from her work was an instantaneous act, which did not produce any continuous situation of a violation of the Convention (compare with Jovanović v.

enforcement order / claim in the insolvency proceedings   5327/11 30/12/2010 Siniša TOMOVIĆ 04/02/1952   Užice 22/10/2007     25/12/2007 Užice 20/07/2010   5352/11 30/12/2010 Radoje JOVANOVIĆ

This obligation cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument (see, among many others, Paun Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 41394/15, §§ 100-101, 7 February 2023).

/1949 Serbian   Živorad ĐORĐEVIĆ 18/02/1957 Serbian   Ljubiša GORUNOVIĆ 05/06/1964 Serbian   Dušan ILJIĆ 11/03/1954 Serbian   Momčilo IVANOVIĆ 11/09/1958 Serbian   Milanka JOVANOVIĆ

Romania , no. 13589/07, § 50, 10 January 2012, and Jovanovic v.   Sweden , no. 10592/12, § 53, 22 October 2015). Article 8 reads as follows: “1.

Radenko GLAVONJIĆ 05/08/2004   23/09/2011   7 years and 1 month   2 levels of jurisdiction Už-6019/2011 of 29 May 2014 300 Euros   1,000 1,500   1906/15 10/12/2014 Boriša JOVANOVIĆ

722⁄04, P. 776⁄04, P. 773⁄07, P.801⁄04, P. 890⁄04, P. 898⁄04, P. 805⁄04, P. 905⁄04, P. 947⁄04 of 2 March 2006 Municipal Court in Majdanpek I. 33⁄08 of 12⁄02⁄2008   75400/10 30/10/2010 Javorka JOVANOVIĆ

1955 Požarevac Ružica LEKIĆ 13 September 2012 22 October 2012 29 January 2015 9 February 2015 12. 40646/15 21/07/2015 Nevenka BIJELIĆ 13/05/1964 Požarevac Vesna VULEVIC 18/03/1961 Požarevac Zorica JOVANOVIĆ

protect the first and fourth applicants’ rights regarding their allegations of taking their children away by private parties as guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Zorica Jovanović

The Court reiterates that dismissal is, in principle, an instantaneous act, which does not give rise to any possible continuous situation of a violation of the Convention (see Jovanović v.

The Convention only governs facts subsequent to its entry into force with regard to that Party (see Jovanović v.   Croatia (dec.), no.   59109/00, ECHR 2002 ‑ III).

  Croatia , no. 53261/08, § 34, 21 June 2011, and Jovanović v. Serbia , no.   32299/08, § 48, 2 October 2012 ) and the means employed to attain it. 34.

En effet, pour un parent et son enfant, être ensemble représente un élément fondamental de la vie familiale (voir, dans le contexte d’une disparition effective, Zorica Jovanović c.

Jovanović, a lawyer practising in Niš. 2.     The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Z. Jadrijević Mladar.