INTIMEES : [D] [U] veuve [V] née le [Date naissance 2] 1937 à [Localité 2] [Adresse 3] [Adresse 3] représentée par Maître Marion MINARD, avocat au barreau de LYON SELARL PHILIPPE LEININGER

On 17 November 2006 the Kraków District Court ( Sąd Rejonowy ) remanded him in custody, on suspicion of leading an organised criminal group engaged in human trafficking and several counts of extortion.

Il s’ensuit que les conclusions présentées à cette fin par la société requérante sont irrecevables et que la fin de non- recevoir opposée par la société Lexing doit être accueillie.

X... a été engagé le 25 octobre 2001, par contrat à durée indéterminée, en qualité de chef de marché pharmacie, par la société Laboratoires Lehning ; qu'il a été licencié par lettre du 25 mai 2007 pour

RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK The 1996 Federal Act on Leaving and Entering the Russian Federation (Procedures), as worded at the material time 21.

The ruling was based on the 2007 Federal Act on Enforcement Proceedings (sections 6, 14, 30, 64, 67 and 68) and the 1996 Federal Act on Leaving and Entering the Russian Federation (Procedures) (section

On an unknown date the applicant asked the court to waive the   prohibition on leaving the territory of Poland.

[the] compulsory letting [of the applicant’s land] suggest that the violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 1 of Protocol No.

    In the leading case of Muradkhanyan v. Armenia (no. 12895/06, 5   June 2012), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

#Performance of a research contract entered into with the Commission - Reimburssement of leasing costs.#Case 251/84.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    Article 293 § 1 (15) and Article 324 § 1 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code allowed decisions of the first-instance court on leaving the claim without consideration to be subject to review in

Thereafter, it was clear that all restrictions on leaving the GDR had been lifted. 22.

Levin tegen Staatssecretaris van Justitie. # Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing: Raad van State - Nederland. # Recht van verblijf. # Zaak 53/81.

He was charged with leading an organised criminal gang smuggling and distributing drugs. Nineteen other co-accused were charged in the same proceedings.

    In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, 10   February 2011) and Ignatov v.

The applicant complained under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention that he had been made subject to a ban on leaving the country and the authorities had not assessed the proportionality of that

    In the leading cases of Ara Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 629/11, §§   48 et seq., 20 October 2016, and Muradkhanyan v. Armenia, no.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.