of the court judgment of 6   June 2000, seen as a part of the right of an access to a court; therefore, no separate examination under Article 8 is required (see mutatis mutandis Mehmet and Suna Yiğit

A complaint is characterised by the facts alleged in it and not merely by the legal grounds or arguments relied on (see   Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey   [GC], no.

  13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008; Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 61, ECHR 2010; Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey [GC], no.   3976/05, § 70, 2 November 2010; and Stummer v.

Kimisi 70 yıllık çınar ağacımız kimisi 70 yıllık canlı tarihimiz, kimisi ulusumuzun yiğit evladı diyordu.

  50963/99, §   112, 20   June 2002, and Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey   [GC], no.   3976/05, §§ 96-98, 2   November 2010).

On milyonlarca kahraman, yiğit bu darbeye karşı direnen insan var. Sen halka karşı savaş açmışsın. Halk her yerde direnir, direnecektir.

paragraph 26 above)   examined by the Supreme Court,   in accordance with the requirements of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention, should the applicant so request (see, Mehmet and Suna Yiğit

generating a proprietary interest falling within the ambit of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 for persons satisfying its requirements (see Stec and Others , (dec.), cited above, §   54, and Şerife Yiğit

Kimisi 70 yıllık çınar ağacımız kimisi 70 yıllık canlı tarihimiz, kimisi ulusumuzun yiğit evladı diyordu.

On milyonlarca kahraman, yiğit bu darbeye karşı direnen insan var. Sen halka karşı savaş açmışsın. Halk her yerde direnir, direnecektir.

Turkey   20/04/2017 Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention 38 49551/17 Yiğit v.

In that regard the Court reiterates that an applicant must exhaust those domestic remedies which are likely to be effective (see, for example, Şerife Yiğit v.

Switzerland , no. 22060/20, §§ 48-49, 13   June 2023; see also, mutatis mutandis , Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey , no.   52658/99, § 28, 17   July 2007). 36.

As established in the case-law, a complaint is characterised by the facts alleged in it and not merely by the legal grounds or arguments relied on ( Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey [GC], no.

    Bülent TOSUN 28/09/1976 Gaziantep   Abdullah ÖZTÜRK Civil Court of General Jurisdiction (İslahiye Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, E:1978/408, K:1991/328)   60326/08 03/12/2008 Yusuf YİĞİT

Türkiye 30/10/2020 Veysel ERDİNÇ 1980 Elazığ Turkish Ferhat YİĞİT   50678/20 Koyuncu v. Türkiye 06/11/2020 Bayram KOYUNCU 1986 Istanbul Turkish Mesut Enes AKBULUT   51014/20 Dulkadir v.

Moreover, under the established case-law, when one remedy has been pursued, the use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see, among many authorities, Şerife Yiğit

Italy , (dec.), nos. 11838/07 and 12302/07, § 42, 24 January 2012, and Yiğit v Turkey , (dec.) no. 39529/10, §§ 21-22, 14 April 2014). 68.

When one remedy has been pursued, the use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see Şerife Yiğit v.   Turkey [GC], no.