Costs and expenses 32.     The applicant also claimed HUF 320,000 [2] for the costs and expenses incurred before the Court. 33.

damage and 10,000,000 lire for costs and expenses;     Ferrari :     15,000,000 lire for non-pecuniary damage and 11,275,488 lire for costs and expenses.

    Costs and expenses 26.

    Costs and expenses 24.     The applicants also claimed EUR 36,000 for the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court. 25.

of the smoking related diseases and the costs of anti-smoking campaigns.

    Costs and expenses 29.     The applicant also claimed EUR 4,000 for the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court. 30.

* * * EXPOSE DU LITIGE Par contrat en date du 1ER septembre 2020, la SCI COSTA PEZY représentée par son gérant M.

C/ SCI SANT-COSTA COUR D'APPEL DE BASTIA CHAMBRE CIVILE ARRET DU SIX JUILLET DEUX MILLE ONZE APPELANT : Monsieur Tibert X... ... ...

Portugal 07/10/2020 FUTEBOL CLUBE DO PORTO FUTEBOL SAD 23/09/1997 Porto Portuguese Nuno BRANDÃO 6. 3708/22 Lima Pinto da Costa v.

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 25504/23 Francisco Manuel SEIXAS DA COSTA

Prata Costa, a lawyer practising in Bragança.

Costa Ramos, a lawyer practising in Lisbon. 2.     The Portuguese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. F. da Graça Carvalho, Deputy Attorney General. 3.

Costa de Almeida, a lawyer practising in Coimbra. The Portuguese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. F. da Graça Carvalho, Deputy Attorney-General.

regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 20 February 1986 by Mr José Carlos Costa

A... et, sur ce constat, fait les comptes entre les parties, la cour d'appel, devant laquelle la société Da Costa, entrepreneur, n'avait pas soutenu que M.

Mme Da Costa a formé un recours hiérarchique, daté du 15 janvier 2026, contre cette décision.

PIERRE ; QUE, CELUI-CI AYANT ETE BLESSE, LA CAISSE PRIMAIRE D'ASSURANCE MALADIE DE L'AUBE A ASSIGNE DA COSTA EN REMBOURSEMENT DES PRESTATIONS SERVIES A SON ASSURE AU TITRE DES ACCIDENTS DU TRAVAIL,

que le moyen de cassation annexé, qui est invoqué à l'encontre de la décision attaquée, n'est pas de nature à permettre l'admission du pourvoi ; DECLARE non admis le pourvoi ; Condamne la société Costa