CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

53 617 résultats pour « Sittinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175737

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2017

28 juin 2017

While she took part in the hearing before the court of appeal, which decided in her favour, that decision was overturned by the cassation court sitting in camera on 12   September 2012, upon an appeal

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 2681

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229299

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2023

6 novembre 2023

2023 communicated on 6 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of impartiality of Judge V.K. sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214858

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2021

10 décembre 2021

KAYAT TRADING LIMITED against Cyprus lodged on 20 November 2018 communicated on 10 December 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged lack of impartiality of Judge N. who was sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196773

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2019

17 septembre 2019

remitted the case for re-trial on the grounds that a member of the trial panel had previously already participated in the case as an investigating judge and therefore should have been excluded from sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119JUD002078907

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2013

19 novembre 2013

Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President,   Alvina Gyulumyan,   Corneliu Bîrsan,   Ján Šikuta, &#

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207DEC002437602

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2010

7 décembre 2010

Criminal proceedings against the applicant On 22 March 2001 the trial against the applicant continued before a Grand Criminal Division sitting as a Jury Court and Judge F. presiding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0224JUD006053400

Admin. suprême

24 février 2005

24 février 2005

Germany, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mr   B.M. Zupančič , President ,   Mr   J. Hedigan ,   Mr   C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209JUD006528209

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2014

9 décembre 2014

When the police arrived at the house, they found the applicant sitting in a chair, and he told them, “He’s my best friend and I’ve stabbed him”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0403DEC004773399

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2001

3 avril 2001

According to the applicant, David Jones and his siblings, plaintiffs in action No.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1205DEC000951006

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2017

5 décembre 2017

Following similar amendments made on 22 June 1999 to the Law on the State Security Courts, the military judge sitting on the bench of the Istanbul State Security Court hearing the applicants’ case was

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-152371

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2015

23 janvier 2015

A large compartment is fitted with six berths and one removable berth; its design capacity is five sleeping and eight sitting places, with four persons sitting on each of the lower berths.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7070

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2000

22 juin 2000

Pursuant to Article 103 of the Constitution on judicial proceedings against ministers, the Chamber of Representatives decided that Mr Coëme should be prosecuted before the Court of Cassation sitting as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140707

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2014

7 janvier 2014

A large compartment is fitted with six berths and one removable berth; its design capacity is five sleeping and eight sitting places, with four persons sitting on each of the lower berths.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624DEC001366903

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2003

24 juin 2003

His father and six siblings were all residing in Colombia and were maintained by his 22 year-old brother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC006444701

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

In his initial letter, the applicant complained that the real reason for his conviction was because he was singing, at the request of guests, songs in Kurdish.

Source officielle
TA

4ème Chambre

DTA_2204817_20240717

Administratif

17 juillet 2024

17 juillet 2024

Ils soutiennent que : - la notification de refus est justifiée par des capacités d'accueil insuffisantes alors qu'une classe de 6ème du collège de Sillingy va être fermée par manque d'effectif ;

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930DEC001519504

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2008

30 septembre 2008

inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 15195/04 by Feisal HADJI against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110DEC002251503

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2005

10 novembre 2005

18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 22515/03 by Ilias KAMPOURIDIS against Greece The European Court of Human Rights, sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5082

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2002

12 décembre 2002

of religion on identity cards: inadmissible Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Statement by association of judges about a matter subsequently decided by some of its members sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1217DEC002207202

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2002

17 décembre 2002

display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 22072/02 by Sławomir MAŁASIEWICZ against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

Source officielle