them of their property in the absence of an examination of the legal requirements for ordering the confiscation of their assets, since there was no finding that a criminal offence had been committed and

In addition, their child had been obliged to follow them in all their movements around the centre (OFII, CIMADE, medical visits), then on their visits to the courthouse (when summoned to appear before

They applied for planning permission for the stationing of their caravan.

The persistent and aggressive enforcement action taken against them deprived them of the only means by which they could enjoy their right to family and private life and home.

There was also the risk, if a further appeal was unsuccessful that the applicants be subject to an award of costs or their lawyers held liable for costs if they had pursued the case unreasonably, improperly

They applied to the ordinary administrative court, which declined jurisdiction, then their case was referred to the Supreme Military Administrative Court which the Jurisdiction Disputes Court adjudged

Following their deportation to Iraq and resettlement in Sweden, the applicants maintained the same complaints and asserted that they had lived in fear that the Iraqi authorities could return them to Iran

This is based on the assumption that their position in the domestic proceedings has been relatively similar, whether or not each of them participated in the given procedural step, either directly or through

As, however, the Board of Admission rejected their applications, they took their cases to the Board of Appeal.

The applicants and their families then moved to Diyarbakır where they currently live.

They put Mr Mukhtarov and Mr Umarov on the ground threatening them with weapons, then forced them into the vehicles and drove off in the direction of Ordzhonikidzevskaya village.

They can all testify that the eleven persons now missing were held with their hands tied behind their backs by rope throughout their detention at the site.

The latter stated that they were unable to identify the persons who had detained them. 47.

The applicants, in their observations to this Court, maintain that their representative attended the High Court hearing that morning but was not heard.

Following the imposition of the round-the-clock curfew on 11 December 2015, they became unable to leave their home and they were cut off from the outside world.

The applicants were then heard by the youth court in conditions which they said were highly unfavourable.

Once they had crossed the barriers, they were arrested by members of the Guardia Civil , who handcuffed them and returned them to the other side of the border, without an identification procedure or the

If the only legal residence which they can find is in a country unconnected with either of them, the exclusion from residence in the "home" country of one of them might constitute a violation of Article

In view of the very serious tensions between the parties, this would unsettle them and make them feel not to know where they belong.