With respect to the so-called “market information”, another challenged source of the report #01/348, the appeal judge held that the forensic expert had simply meant the Delta Comm letters behind it.

:6pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .sB20C2835 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:-17.6pt } .s7BB60D65 { margin-top:24pt

On 23 June 2016 the applicant was informed of the annulment. No reasons for the decision, other than a reference to the FSB letter of 14   June 2016, were given. 3.

margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s81CCF55C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .s88A92475 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom

    In the letters, the applicant informed the Registrar that he did not accept the friendly settlement proposal.

Il était également fait référence à l’information apparue dans un autre média.

:6pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s61BF121A { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:31.75pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-20.15pt; page-break-inside:avoid;

In letters of 7 August 2009, 12 October 2009 and 11 February 2010 the applicant again expressed the view that the Government's declaration should be dismissed by the Court.

Having consulted my client, I would inform you that he accepts the proposal and waives any further claims against the United Kingdom in respect of the facts giving rise to this application.

[P] [O], sa déclaration d'appel du 14 novembre 2024 mentionnant simplement un « appel total» n'ayant pas opéré d'effet dévolutif, A titre subsidiaire, si par extraordinaire la Cour devait s'estimer

:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s743F3A55 { margin-right:0pt; margin-left:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s2044A09A { margin-left

des lecteurs ; qu'en l'espèce, M.

    By a letter of 5 February 2025, the Government informed the Registry of the Court that the second applicant, Ms Satı Sibel Cıngı, had died on 19   October 2024. 14.

The letter noted the existence of “some possible legal complications” as “it   [was] not known when the [object had] left Greece or Italy, or when it [had   been] discovered”.

From the submissions of the two witnesses, from whom the appellants received the information presented in the letter [concerning the part of the letter in which it was stated that M.S.

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sDD67E0A9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:center }

The letter further stated that all information concerning the criminal investigation was to be obtained from the district prosecutor's office. 24.

} .sB90861A5 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .sE208486F { font-family

immédiatement la société IPS, laquelle avait modifié la présentation dès qu'elle avait eu l'information ; qu'en retenant que le demandeur savait ces affirmations mensongères tant pour la gelée royale

} .s145CCEB3 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s6E97E8AF { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt } .s583D00FA { margin-top:0pt; margin-left