No costs were to be paid by the applicants. The applicants complained that the breach of Article 1 of Protocol No.

    Merits 55.

    Furthermore, when a party is fully exempted from the duty to pay litigation costs in terms of Article 164 paragraph 2, the court of first instance should recognise the right to free legal

It also found a violation of Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 8. No separate issue was found to arise under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8.

    In a judgment delivered on 7 June 2016 (“the principal judgment”), the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.

  55/1999 ).

They relied on Articles   6, 8 and 14 of Article 8 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

    The Government contended that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 or Article 13 of the Convention, or of Article   1 of Protocol No.   1. 18.

    The Court notes that it has examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, in particular, Göç , cited above, §§ 55 ‑ 58;

July 2003 Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom - 39647/98 and 40461/98 Judgment 22.7.2003 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Non-disclosure by prosecution, on ground

    The applicants alleged that the refusal to award them their defence costs, after they had been acquitted in their respective criminal proceedings, was in violation of Article 6 § 2 of the

prend tout ou partie des mesures définies aux articles L. 733-1, L. 733-4 et L. 733-7.

under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

measure constitutes a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

Article 247.

et notamment ses articles L.300-2 et R.300-1 ; Vu le code de l'expropriation et notamment ses articles R.11-3 et R.15-1 ; Vu la loi n° 80-502 du 4 juillet 1980 d'orientation agricole ; Vu le décret n°

    Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol   No.

, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER, avocat postulant et assistée de Me Christelle DAUDE de la SCP COSTE-BERGER-DAUDE-VALLET, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER, avocat plaidant INTIMEE : FEDERATION

to one of the conclusions specified under (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 of that Article.