Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A.

    The applicant, Mr Daniel Lipšic, is a Slovak national, who was born in 1973 and lives in Bratislava. He was represented before the Court by Mr   P.

Relying in particular on Article   6   §   1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights, the applicants complained of the fact that the proceedings concerning the

They also rely on Article 6 (right to a fair hearing).   Procedure   The application was lodged on 17 December 2001.

on 24 April 2003 at the 834th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

ZORICĂ against Romania and 24 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 12   September 2019 as a Committee composed of:  

Bálint Budapest   27/08/2020 09/04/2020 3,400     64253/19 09/12/2019 Béla Ferenc JAKAB 1981 Sándor JAKAB 15/03/1988 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   15/10/2020 03/07/2020 4,600 &#xa0

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 51132/22 Gábor ROSTÁS against Hungary and 14 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s2D4DB0A7 { height:12.75pt } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right

He relies on Article 5 § 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to be brought to trial within a reasonable time).

    The Court observes that according to its established case-law, rights to an old-age pension or social benefit are not included among the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention and

:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dbdbdb } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right

sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

        Application No. 23777/94                       by Daniel

, which prohibits torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which guarantees the right to a decision on civil rights and obligations within a “reasonable time”

Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

rights, must not infringe upon the rights and freedoms of others or conflict with the interests of the children.