), no. 54810/00, 26 October 2004), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine separately the merits of the applicant’s identical complaint made under Article 13 of the Convention (see Jovanović

  67208/01, 18 May 2004), or if they manifestly lacked any real purpose (see Jovanović v. Serbia (dec.), no.

the national courts are obliged to examine with particular care and rigour cases involving the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols (see, mutatis mutandis, Paun   Jovanović

However, the authorities should respect and apply domestic legislation in a foreseeable and consistent manner (see Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 32299/08, §   50, 2   October 2012).

Jovanović, a lawyer practising in Niš. 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A.     The circumstances of the case 1.

February 2009 / 24 March 2011 39592/09 15 July 2009 Dragoljub Milačić (“the tenth applicant”) born in 1956 28 December 2007 13 March 2009 14 May 2009 11 February 2010 65365/09 25 November 2009 Vaso Jovanović

by the applicant under Article 6 of the Convention is closely linked to her complaint under Article 8 and may accordingly be examined as part of the latter complaint (see, among other authorities, Jovanovic

  37571/97, § 55, 7 November 2002; Jovanović v.   Croatia (dec.), no.   59109/00, ECHR 2002 ‑ III; Litovchenko v.

accordance with the generally recognised rules of international law, the Convention only governs, for each Contracting Party, facts subsequent to its entry into force with regard to that Party (see, e.g., Jovanović

    The Court, as the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of any case before it (see Zorica Jovanović v. Serbia , no.

Indeed, the Court has emphasised that in cases involving the care of children and contact restrictions, the child’s interests must come before all other considerations (see Jovanovic [ v.

The Convention only governs facts subsequent to its entry into force with regard to that Party (see Jovanović v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59109/00, ECHR 2002 ‑ III).

Serbia , no. 1099/08, §   59, 22 May 2012; as well as Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 32299/08, § 53, 2   October 2012). III.     OTHER COMPLAINTS 76.

Jovanović, a lawyer practising in Podgorica. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Pavličić. 4.

consider the above-mentioned proceedings, the Court has to put them into their context, which inevitably means to some extent having regard to the earlier events as set out in paragraphs 8-56 above (see Jovanovic

Indeed, the Court has emphasised that in cases involving the care of children and contact restrictions, the child’s interests must come before all other considerations (see Jovanovic [v.

They stressed that the Court had declared that “the child’s interest must come before all other considerations” ( Jovanovic v. Sweden , no. 10592/12, § 76, 22 October 2015).

The complaints of Mr Petreš and Mr Jovanović, who had been granted permanent residence permits, and the remainder of the other applicants’ complaints were declared inadmissible.

programa prevencije i kontrole tuberkuloze tokom 2017. godine u odnosu na prethodnih 5 godina ), published by the Institute of Public Health of Serbia ( Institut za javno zdravlje Srbije „Dr Milan Jovanović