CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328DEC005841112
28 mars 2017
The judge explains what evidence he can propose in the proceedings and in what manner, and warns him of the repercussions of applying the burden of proof rule. ...
Page 19 sur 1002
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156311
22 juin 2015
What was the size of the exercise yard and did it have a roof? b) What was the size of the “conversation places” ( sohbet odası )?
Cour d'Appel
6253cd24bd3db21cbdd92625
8 juillet 2015
Mme X... a acquis en 2009 auprès de la société Yachting Club Porticcio (YCP) deux bateaux, un Boston Whaler 270 Outrage et un Trophy 2503 CC pour un montant total de 160 000 euros.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116881
28 janvier 2013
Application no. 9477/12 (a) What attempts were made to identify the weapon from which the bullet had been fired?
ECLI:CEDH:001-110645
14 mars 2012
In particular, given that the Migration Court accepted that he was at risk in Diyala and Baghdad, what reason is there to think that he would not be at risk in Anbar?
ECLI:CEDH:001-197200
2 octobre 2019
What is the exact amount of the loss suffered by the applicant?
ECLI:CEDH:001-149186
26 novembre 2014
If not, what were the reasons for that?
ECLI:CEDH:001-209749
28 janvier 2021
What are the available means of assistance for persons who have been granted international protection status such as the applicants?
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3506
15 décembre 2005
They gave the applicant the choice, either to maintain what he had said and to give reasons why a sentence should not be imposed on him, or to retract.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0516DEC005342999
16 mai 2000
There should not be any delays or arguments about what officers may wish to say or what they feel is appropriate to say. Police officers have to tell what they know and get on with it.”
ECLI:CEDH:002-7516
14 mars 2013
Law – Article 10 (a) Admissibility (no significant disadvantage) – The severity of a violation should be assessed taking account of both the applicant's subjective perception and what was
ECLI:CEDH:002-12487
4 juin 2019
Moreover, when the prosecution was in possession of a vast volume of unprocessed material it might be legitimate for it to sift through the information in order to identify what was likely to be relevant
ECLI:CEDH:001-200415
18 décembre 2019
What is the applicant’s legal status?
ECLI:CEDH:002-2265
12 février 2008
However, he was dismissed for failing to consult his colleagues and for disclosing what it was alleged were secret documents.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12872
25 juin 2020
court as to what factual conclusions it should reach.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202DEC007061911
2 décembre 2021
They also failed to submit a copy of their appeal before the Supreme Court to demonstrate to what extent they had pursued the relevant complaint before the latter.
ECLI:CEDH:001-163527
12 mai 2016
(b) what were rules governing detention of physically challenged detainees?
ECLI:CEDH:001-126417
28 août 2013
In particular: (a) What was the applicant’s status in the criminal proceedings concerning murder of A.M. between 11 p.m. on 2 December and 11 a.m. on 3 December 2004?
ECLI:CEDH:001-122677
20 juin 2013
If yes, what measures did the authorities take to enforce the Tirana District Court’s decision of 4 May 2012?
ECLI:CEDH:001-177372
4 septembre 2017
If not, what were the remedies they had at their disposal? 3.