CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146426
26 août 2014
Relying on Article 13 of the Convention in conjunction with the above complaint, the applicant complains that the domestic proceedings were ineffective.
Page 19 sur 107
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13765
30 août 2022
Several months later, the BNB withdrew KTB’s banking licence and extended the special administrators’ mandate, until the appointment of liquidators by the Sofia City Court.
cr
61372523cd5801467741b43f
4 mars 1991
201, 206 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale, défaut de motifs, manque de base légale, ensemble violation des droits de la défense ; "en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a refusé de constater l'inexistence du mandat
soc
613722e5cd58014677402e59
6 novembre 1997
Assurances, dont le siège social est ..., prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège, 3°/ deMme Annie Z..., secrétaire, demeurant 5, square Pierre Binet, 03410 Domerat
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD003184807
30 mai 2013
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0726JUD001611215
26 juillet 2018
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 31. The domestic law applicable at the relevant time is summarised in Schneider v. Germany (cited above, §§ 29-37). 32.
5ème Chambre
DTA_2105988_20231120
20 novembre 2023
Toutefois, d'une part, un mandat électif, qui donne droit à une indemnité, ne peut être assimilé à une activité extérieure rémunérée par un salaire.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC005124308
24 mars 2009
Relevant international and domestic law The relevant international and domestic law are summarised in the judgment in the case of Soldatenko v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-235933
30 août 2024
a judgment of 29 June 2020, the Zardab District Court found that the applicant had committed the administrative offence under Article 535.1 of the CAO and fined him in the amount of 200 Azerbaijani manats
ECLI:CEDH:001-250187
20 avril 2026
These events took place during the series of protests in Ukraine between 21 November 2013 and 21 February 2014, commonly referred to as “Euromaidan” and/or “Maidan” (see Shmorgunov and Others v.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12442
9 avril 2019
The violations found stemmed chiefly from an unwavering application of the domestic normative framework.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0926DEC003921117
26 septembre 2024
Referring to the relevant domestic legislation, the court also noted some irregularities regarding the allocation of the plot of land.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0225JUD007022714
25 février 2025
The Court notes that in the domestic proceedings the applicant asked the domestic courts to award her in-kind compensation in the form of a new flat with a greater number of rooms in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0516DEC001305810
16 mai 2023
destroyed appliances and lost profits, had been in breach of domestic law. 7 .
ECLI:CEDH:001-229069
30 octobre 2023
s husband was one of the police officers deployed in response to the series of protests in Ukraine between 21 November 2013 and 21 February 2014, commonly referred to as “Euromaidan” and/or “Maidan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0422JUD005746116
22 avril 2025
In the present case, the domestic courts held that the expropriation of the applicant’s property had been in compliance with domestic law (see paragraph 5 above).
ECLI:CEDH:001-128189
15 octobre 2013
( mandati fiduciari )).
ECLI:CEDH:002-14400
22 octobre 2024
The mere fact that this had been allowed under domestic law had no bearing on the assessment for the purposes of Article 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC008327517
3 septembre 2019
Given the Court’s instructions, the applicant considered that the Government should have verified the lawyer’s mandate to receive such sum.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007JUD005457213
7 octobre 2025
As regards the lost profits, the domestic courts found that the applicant had failed to provide any supporting documents. 8 .