She did not, however, receive any significant payment for her labour. During that time, her passport was also retained. In August 2006 she collapsed in a bank and spent a month in hospital.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1°/ Monsieur René, Louis Z..., 2°/ Madame Y..., Augustine, Désirée

    On 9 August 2022 Judge Radzik informed the third applicant that she would be transferred to the Labour and Social Security Division as of 12   September 2022.

{ font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 25 August

  Subsequently, on 13 August 1993 the applicant's employment at the factory was terminated on the ground that he had failed to report to work between 2 and 13 August 1993 without a reason. 6.

On an unspecified date, on the ground that his conviction allegedly gave him the status of a person politically persecuted by the communist regime, the applicant brought proceedings against the Cluj Labour

    The applicant filed claims with the Budapest Labour Court on 25   August and 7 September 1993, respectively, alleging unlawful dismissal by, and claiming compensation from, his former

On 31 August 1994 the Labour Court decided that the applicants’ dismissal had been unlawful. It transferred the applicants’ pecuniary claims to the Economic Collegium of the Regional Court.

On 28   August   2016 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

    On 21 May, 9 August and 6 September 1996, the Budapest Labour Court held hearings and, on 15 November 1996, it dismissed the applicant’s claims.

On 2 August 1996, following the applicant’s appeal, the Munich Regional Labour Court, at an oral hearing, confirmed the decision of the Labour Court and did not admit an appeal on points of law.

On 9 May 2014, during labour court proceedings, the Court of Appeal upheld the reasoning of the first instance court finding that the applicant’s dismissal had been legally void.

0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Published on 18 September 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 9327/23 A.S. against Latvia lodged on 17 February 2023 communicated on 28 August

    On 30 August 1998 lawyers representing Akbank lodged a claim with the Trabzon Labour Court for the return of the missing money from the applicant and the two colleagues who had been working

The applicant was subjected to forced labour during the Second World War on the territory of Poland occupied at that time by German forces.

In August 2019 the Sztum Prison Governor referred him to work in an external company, namely the Polish Factory of Water and Heat Meters “Fila”, on a full-time basis.

On 16 January 2002 the Supreme Court appointed the Tatabánya Labour Court to deal with the case. 47.     On 12 March 2002 the Labour Court heard the parties.

Meetings between the parties were held on 13 March, 16 August and 21 August 1989 without achieving any result.

The applicant appealed on the grounds inter alia that there had been no grounds for reopening the case and quashing the judgment of 31 August 1999.