font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 19 September 2022   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 19812/18 Alberto FERREIRA ESTEVAM against Portugal lodged on 16 April 2018 communicated on 31 August

On that basis, the applicant’s work contract with the university was extended twice, in June 2013 and in August 2016, enabling the applicant to work at the university until 31   August 2018, the day

12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 67 August-September

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 188 August-September

    Nevertheless, this extra element does not prompt the Court to depart from the reasoning developed in Sidabras and Džiautas .

  Portugal 17/10/2022 Augusto DIAMANTINO DA SILVA 1968 Coimbra Portugaise V.

  23134/24) against the Portuguese Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 5   August

In the case of Sidabras and Others v.

The civil claim was rejected by the Šiauliai District Court on 16   April 2019 and the Šiauliai Regional Court on 13   August 2019.

  6635/13.4T3SNT) by the public prosecutor of the Department of Investigation and Prosecution ( Departamento de Investigação e Ação Penal ) in Sintra on allegations of having committed the crimes

    The applicant, Lisnic Nicolae & Co, is an individual enterprise ( întreprindere individuală ) registered in Moldova and located in Sîngera, Moldova.

    The applicant was represented by Mr Ciprian Panaitescu, a lawyer practising in Sinaia.

The appeal was refused on 13 August 2009. 16.

The circumstances of the case     On 31 August 1991 the applicant was arrested.

By judgment of 13 August 2003, the Sverdlovsk Regional Court reversed the District Court’s decision and dismissed the claim, relying on the following grounds: “It appears from the impugned decision by

  By a letter received on 31 August, the Secretary to the Commission informed the Registrar that the Delegate would submit his observations at the hearing.   6.

    On 8 August 2014 criminal proceedings were instituted against Mr   I.

    In August 2013 the applicant was questioned by the police and an investigating judge on the suspicion that he had committed several offences, including an aggravated robbery.

On 13 August 1998 the Regional Court held another hearing at which witnesses P., K. and M. failed to appear. The hearing was adjourned until 24   August 1998 with a view to calling them again.