Labour Court ( Il Giudice del Lavoro ), having seen the documents submitted by the bank, considered that there existed both the requirements of a “presumption of sufficient legal basis” ( fumus boni iuris

font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 12 July 2017   SECOND SECTION Application no. 72238/14 Iurii

; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 10 February 2021 Published on 1 March 2021   THIRD SECTION Application no. 53114/20 Iurii

Cour d’Appel d’[Localité 5] Tribunal judiciaire du MANS Contrôle des mesures de soins psychiatriques Minute : 25/00399 Dossier : N° RG 25/01144 - N° Portalis DB2N-W-B7J-IURI ORDONNANCE Rendue

grec Thessalonique 16 Eleftherios KARATZOYNIS 1985 grec Thessalonique 17 Georgios KARAVAS 1979 grec Messini 18 Shkelqim KOCEKU 1985 albanais Larisa 19 Christoforos KONSTANTINIDIS 1977 grec Athènes 20 Iurii

to the University Act of 1966, ( Allgemeines Hochschul-Studiengesetz ) in force at the relevant time, the applicant was awarded in a graduation ceremony ( Sponsion ) the academic degree of magister iuris

width:194.61pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 56161/09 Iuri

Localité 3] ЕТ - Madame, [F], [H], [Adresse 5], [Localité 4] DÉFENDEUR - représenté par : Maître Charles-Antoine CHAPUIS - CABINET AVOCAT CHAPUIS -, [Adresse 6], [Localité 5] Maître Louis HERAUD - Cabinet Iuri-Europ

Oleg FEDICO 16/07/1976 Chişinău   16 24759/15 12/05/2015 Oleg PETRACHI 27/03/1967 Chişinău Igor POHILA 17 25502/15 22/05/2015 Marin REBEJA 07/05/1984 Bălăbăneşti Igor POHILA 18 26284/15 27/05/2015 Iuri

Informations iuridiques et tenant a l'activité La SARL BOCRENO au capital de 2.000 Euros constitué d'apports en numéraire et divisé en 20 parts sociales de 100 Euros chacune a été constituée par acte

    The third party interveners – the Governments of the Czech and Slovak Republics and Ordo Iuris Institute of Legal Culture – primarily made submissions on the general principles within which

In the case of Iurii v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, President,   Valeriu Griţco

intervene in accordance with Article 36 § 1 of the Convention, Having regard to the comments submitted by the Governments of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic and by ADF International and Ordo Iuris

  République de Moldova , n o 28430/06, § 48, 17 avril 2012, et Iurii c.

Moldova , n o 53773/00, § 68, 13 juin 2006, et Iurii c.

observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant; the comments submitted by the Governments of the Czech and Slovak Republics and the Ordo Iuris

03/2009 08/04/2014 14/09/2009 08/07/2014 72636/13 FURTUNĂ 23/06/2020 23/06/2020 35367/08 IPTEH SA ET AUTRES 24/11/2009 29/06/2010 24/02/2010 29/10/2010 53773/00 ISTRATE 13/06/2006 13/09/2006 24446/09 IURII

Armenia and Bulgaria, who had exercised their rights to intervene pursuant to Article 36 § 1 of the Convention; the comments submitted by the Government of the Slovak Republic and the organisation Ordo Iuris

République de Moldova , n o 28430/06, § 48, 17 avril 2012, et Iurii   c.

/2009 08/04/2014 14/09/2009 08/07/2014 72636/13 FURTUNĂ 23/06/2020 23/06/2020 35367/08 IPTEH SA AND OTHERS 24/11/2009 29/06/2010 24/02/2010 29/10/2010 53773/00 ISTRATE 13/06/2006 13/09/2006 24446/09 IURII