CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC001200515

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2018

13 septembre 2018

It appears from the case files that the applicants have not lodged actions for tortious liability before the domestic courts, or have failed to provide the Court with a final decision rendered by the competent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC006296414

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

above), and would therefore not have been subject to the indefinite notification requirement, it cannot have been “necessary” to subject him to such a requirement. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120DEC000225609

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2018

20 novembre 2018

against Georgia and Umar Yestateyevich BAGAYEV against Georgia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 20   November 2018 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127DEC007837517

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2018

27 novembre 2018

While the property might not have been ideal or entirely to the applicant’s satisfaction, he considered that there was nothing to suggest that it would be harmful or have a significant impact upon her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313DEC004565111

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2018

13 mars 2018

The applicants could not claim to have had a “legitimate expectation” that a civil claim for payment of the full minimum wage relating to the period prior to 8   March 2011 would have been determined

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC002105611

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

He also alleged that he did not have an effective remedy for this complaint, contrary to the requirements of Article 13 of the Convention. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031DEC007638611

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2017

31 octobre 2017

CHALILOPOULOU against Greece The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on   31   October 2017 as a Chamber composed of:   Kristina Pardalos, President,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0205DEC004290898

Admin. suprême

5 février 2004

5 février 2004

The applicants in the fourth application (no. 7319/02), Ms Teodora Alexandrova Shoileva ‑ Stambolova and Mr Stefan Alexandrov Shoilev, are Bulgarian nationals who were born in 1964 and 1968, respectively

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120DEC002496409

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2018

20 novembre 2018

At the same time, they did not take any steps to acquire the ownership of the apartment in question, and their decision to remain mere tenants, and not owners, appears to have been deliberate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC004188998

Admin. suprême

30 mars 1999

30 mars 1999

:inline-block } .s6A5D7EE7 { width:29.33pt; display:inline-block } .sEA111250 { width:16.65pt; display:inline-block } DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF   Application no. 41889/98 by Alessandro

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:003-2078944-2204337

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2007

27 juillet 2007

Les quatre premiers sont membres d’un club de motards du nom de Screwdrivers qui se trouve à Hamar (Norvège) et qui, à l’époque des faits, était un lieu de rencontre des Hells Angels .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164148

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2016

8 juin 2016

the Portuguese authorities, which demonstrate their commitment to pursue their efforts to resolve the problem of excessive length of judicial proceedings;   Noting also that encouraging results have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0204JUD006886010

Admin. suprême

4 février 2016

4 février 2016

, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC002167205

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

xa0; December 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-200742

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2020

10 janvier 2020

which breached the applicants’ rights was sufficient, and would allow the tenants the possibility of a fair hearing where they would be able to submit evidence concerning any other title they might have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0329JUD006235609

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2018

29 mars 2018

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD004675599

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

She alleged that the issuing of the permit would have significantly increased the value of her land. 11.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-891502-916128

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2003

18 décembre 2003

The failure to mention any other ground for declaring the appeals inadmissible was likely to have taken the accused by surprise, particularly as he might legitimately have believed that Article 508 of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139934

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2013

3 décembre 2013

The two applicants have been resident in the Netherlands since then.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC000446409

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

Such a lawyer shall have qualifications required for a defence lawyer in criminal proceedings.

Source officielle

Page 20 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →