The only spectator whom I heard excusing Bjarki and Einar argued that there had only been two of them and the third one was regrettably missing from their camp, that is to say the supervisor.

    The applicants complained that by ordering them to vacate the flat in question, the domestic courts had violated their right to respect for their home.

They had travelled using their own passports but had destroyed them upon arrival in Sweden.

To pull the girls out of the environment they were familiar with and where they had spent most of their time would cause them significant psychological harm.

The security forces went to his father’s apartment and then to his uncle’s. While searching the apartment they found four men sleeping in one of the rooms.

The boys described the details of how their father had sexually abused them in 2009.

They also contended that the evidence had been hidden from the defence and that it had been impossible for them to identify whether certain recordings could exonerate their clients or whether there had

They had made considerable efforts to elude the protection measures and obstruct the work of the officers assigned to protect them.

Ah, wait a minute - there are all the measures authorising the requests for telephone tapping and seizures; they are all appended.

The persistent and aggressive enforcement action taken against them deprived them of the only means by which they could enjoy their right to family and private life and home.

them of their property in the absence of an examination of the legal requirements for ordering the confiscation of their assets, since there was no finding that a criminal offence had been committed and

They alleged that there had been a violation of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention.

They alleged that there had been a violation of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention.

Since certain of these individuals could not be deported because they risked ill-treatment in their country of origin, the Government considered it necessary to create an extended power permitting their

A number of the applicants also invoked Article 8, alleging that their expulsion would entail an interference with their private life as they had formed links with Norway. 11.

All they had left were the clothes they were wearing. Neighbours gave them a few more clothes. They remained there, in abject poverty, for some four months.

The squad officers verbally and physically assaulted them on their way from the car to the punishment ward where the newly arrived detainees were held.

On 28 December 2020 the company sent the applicants letters informing them of their disciplinary dismissal as of the day after reception of the letter.

They further submitted that the authorities’ refusal to permit their daughters to leave the country breached Article 2 § 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention.

There are no toilets in their cells and, since the beginning of 2008, the prison authorities have allowed them to use the common sanitary facilities three times a day.