CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 077 résultats pour « Frank WISMER Me »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1123DEC000929602

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2006

23 novembre 2006

France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, p. 89, § 26, and Arsenić v. Slovenia , nos. 22174/02 and 23666/02, §§   15-19, 29 June 2006).

Source officielle

Page 20 sur 154

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD008247917

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2024

18 janvier 2024

The three of them were interviewed and the applicant noted his wish to apply for asylum on a document he had been asked to complete and sign.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0921DEC005536818

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2021

21 septembre 2021

The court found that the children had not expressed a wish to see the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC004300904

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

The Government hereby wish to express – by way of unilateral declaration – its acknowledgement of the unreasonable duration of the domestic proceedings in which the applicant was involved.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC001472518

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2021

8 juin 2021

The Court has also established that it is for the heir who wishes to pursue the proceedings before the Court to substantiate his or her standing to do so (see, for example, Belskiy v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10550

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 1994

22 septembre 1994

France (on the merits) - 13616/88 Judgment 22.9.1994 Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Pre-emption by Revenue, on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224843

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2023

29 avril 2023

In particular, did he invoke before the Constitutional Court, at least in substance, the right under Article   8 of the Convention on which he now wishes to rely before the Court (see, for example

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2931516-3228008

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2009

18 novembre 2009

They allege that the Turkish authorities are preventing them from having access to this property and disposing of it as they wish.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015DEC001837207

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2013

15 octobre 2013

They also expressed a wish to pursue the application in the applicant’s stead and they fully agreed with the terms of the friendly settlement reached between the applicant and the respondent State.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-108110

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2011

2 décembre 2011

Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)212   Information on the measures taken to comply with the judgments in the cases of Krombach against France and Mariani against France   Introductory case

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-106882

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2011

14 septembre 2011

#0069d6 } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)104 [1]   Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Mamère against France

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC005848511

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

The declaration provided as follows: “ . ..The Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration ‑   their acknowledgement that the conditions of the applicant’s detention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320DEC001685310

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2012

20 mars 2012

It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC004129807

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

The declaration provided as follows: ““(...) the Government hereby wish to express – by way of unilateral declaration – its acknowledgement of the unreasonable length of the administrative proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206DEC003015806

Admin. suprême

6 février 2007

6 février 2007

  France , no. 66289/01, §   46, ECHR 2005 ‑ ... (extracts).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC003203702

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2010

16 mars 2010

The declaration provided as follows: “ The Government hereby wish to express - by way of unilateral declaration – its acknowledgment of the unreasonable duration of the domestic proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD004381316

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2022

1 décembre 2022

    The Court takes note of the death of Mr Lugachev and of the wish of his alleged partner, Ms Klachkova, to pursue the proceedings he had initiated. 8.

Source officielle
CA

1ère Chambre

67ff3d496d3290e00e0e7a7c

Appel

15 avril 2025

15 avril 2025

Mme Anne-Sophie WILLM et Madame Bénédicte MANTEAUX, Conseillers. Greffier : Mme Fabienne ARNOUX, Greffier, lors des débats et du prononcé de la décision.

Source officielle
CA

1ère Chambre

66177da2e5d80f0008c2e6ee

Appel

10 avril 2024

10 avril 2024

Cédric SAUNIER, conseiller, Mme Anne-Sophie WILLM, conseiller. Greffier : Mme Fabienne ARNOUX, Greffier, lors des débats et du prononcé de la décision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1128JUD004604313

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2024

28 novembre 2024

in their stead, as well as of the absence of an objection to that wish on the Government’s part. 9.

Source officielle