All applicants are represented before the Court by Jean Gould, a solicitor practising in Birmingham.   A.

Switzerland , judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no.   173, p. 26, § 68). 27.

    On 31 March 2009 the applicants requested that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 of the Convention and Rule 73.

The applicant and her mother stated that that evening P. had begged for pardon and had claimed that he would marry the applicant when she would become of age.

    On 4 March 1999 servicemen T. and A. were brought to a military police station. On 5 March 1999 the applicant was also brought to the same police station.

  On 30 March 1992 criminal proceedings were instituted against her for fraud and forgery of official documents.

MARXER                  B.

Belgium , 2   March 1987, § 52, Series A no. 113, and Py v. France , no. 66289/01, § 46, ECHR 2005-I). 51.

    On 12 March 2009 notice of the application was given to the Government.

   On 20 March 1996, the Government submitted further observations and on 29 March 1996, the applicant submitted observations on the merits.

    In her interviews with police and social services KON at times claimed that she had not been abused, while on other occasions she implied that she had.

Belgium (judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113).

    In a judgment of 13 March 2001, the Criminal Court acquitted the two defendants.

Par déclaration adressée au greffe le 19 mars 2024, Mme [U] a interjeté appel de ce jugement. L'affaire a été clôturée par ordonnance du 3 mars 2026.

There was nothing in the pockets of the jeans. A prosecutor from Elazığ was present during the examination and placed the jeans and the shoe in a bag as evidence.

Mr   McGinley publicly claimed that he was one of a number of nuclear test veterans who had suffered ill health as the result of exposure to radiation. 5.

  12686/03, § 15, 20   March 2009), Baydar v. the Netherlands (no.   55385/14, §§ 21-29, 24   April 2018) and Ilias Papageorgiou v. Greece (no.

The police officers claimed that the applicant was aggressive on being detained but that they had not used special measures to subdue him.

He is represented before the Court by Mr Jean-Alain Blanc, a member of the Conseil d’État and Court of Cassation Bar. A.