It follows that the Government’s submissions in this respect are of no relevance to the assessment of any alleged abuse of the right of individual application (see , mutatis mutandis ,   Paun Jovanović

It also stated that A.S. intended to involve Mila Jovovic, Jean Reno and Andriy Shevchenko in the production of the film.

recognised rules of international law, the Convention only governs, for each Contracting Party, facts subsequent to its entry into force with regard to that Party (see, among many other authorities, Jovanović

Court’s view, although the Government have not raised an objection as to its competence ratione temporis , this issue nevertheless calls for its consideration proprio motu (see, mutatis mutandis , Jovanović

  67208/01, 18   May 2004), or if they manifestly lacked any real purpose (see Jovanović v.   Serbia (dec.), no.

Austria , 23 June 1993, § 38, Series A no. 255 ‑ C) and Article   13 (see, mutatis mutandis , Zorica Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 21794/08, § 80, ECHR 2013). III.

Turkey , no. 25165/94, §   88, 31   May 2005; Zorica Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 21794/08, § 43, 26 March 2013; and, most recently, İhsan Ay v.

), no. 54810/00, 26 October 2004), the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine separately the merits of the applicant’s identical complaint made under Article 13 of the Convention (see Jovanović

Jovanović, a lawyer practising in Novi Sad (Serbia). 2.     The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Pavličić. The circumstances of the case 3.

Jovanović, a lawyer practising in Beograd. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Ms V. Rodić, their Agent at the time. 3.

  47634/99, 29 June 2000 and Jovanović v.   Croatia (dec.), no. 59109/00, 28 February 2002).

  40646 (Ms   Nevenka Bijelić – the fifteenth applicant; Ms   Vesna Vulević – the sixteenth applicant; and Ms   Zorica Jovanović – the seventeenth applicant) 66.

Montenegro , no. 17931/07, § 32, 21   September 2010; and Jovanović v. Serbia , no. 32299/08, § 50, 2 October 2012).

accordance with the generally recognised rules of international law, the Convention only governs, for each Contracting Party, facts subsequent to its entry into force with regard to that Party (see, e.g., Jovanović

(“the Convention”) by four Serbian nationals, Mr   Neđo Krndija (“the first applicant”), Ms Enita Mavrić (“the second applicant”), Mr Predrag Vukosavljević (“the third applicant”) and Mr Bora Jovanović

Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18   May 2004), or if they manifestly lacked any real purpose (see Jovanović v.

Turkey [GC], nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04, § 43, ECHR 2012; and Zorica Jovanović v. Serbia , no.   21794/08, §   43, ECHR 2013). 42.

Municipal Court in Novi Pazar   I.br.226/07 of 12 March 2007 6 years and 8 months 4,800   33362/12 28/05/2012   Zoran JOVANOVIĆ 24/10/1972 Kragujevac Serbian   Nenad COLOVIC 1.

Jovanova, lawyer 18 June 2010 4. Galanxhi,and Others no.