6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s8EB5F569 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super }       TROISIÈME SECTION         AFFAIRE CESİM YILDIRIM

Finlande (déc.), n o 27110/95, CEDH 1999 ‑ VI   ; Yildirim c. Autriche (déc.), n o   34308/96, 19 octobre 1999   ; Backlund c.

Turquie (déc.), n o   38925/97, Yildirim c.   Turquie (déc.), n o 40800/98, et Durgun c.

Türkiye 13/02/2018 Feyza YILDIRIM 1993 Rize Turkish Fatma ALBAYRAK 25. 11977/18 Aydoğdu v. Türkiye 05/03/2018 Cumhur AYDOĞDU 1978 Tekirdag Turkish Büteyra DEMIR 26. 12628/18 Göksu v.

Şükran YILDIRIM 1964 turque Mersin    

Türkiye 16/12/2016 Mustafa DİNÇ 31/10/1965 Ankara Tevfik YILDIRIM 500,000 3,000 Invoice drawn up by the lawyer 1,000 2,000 17. 343/17 Yılbaşı v.

Türkiye 12/11/2019 Ramazan YILDIRIM 1983 Ordu Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 24. 60999/19 Kuş v. Türkiye 14/11/2019 Bahadır KUŞ 1977 Ankara Turkish Ahmet ÖZDİN 25. 61139/19 Atlı v.

Türkiye 05/03/2018 Servet AVCI 1986 Erzurum Turkish Ömer Faruk YILDIRIM 14. 12166/18 Aktürk v. Türkiye 19/02/2018 Hüseyin AKTÜRK 1983 Denizli Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 15. 12241/18 Aycıl v.

concluded that the seizure in issue involved a finding of guilt subsequent to a criminal charge; it therefore did not constitute a “penalty” within the meaning of Article 7 of the Convention (see   Yildirim

prononcée à l’encontre des sociétés requérantes ou de leurs représentants par les juridictions italiennes (voir, mutatis mutandis , Valico c.Italie (déc.), n o   70074/01, 21 mars 2006   ; Yildirim

; border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } DEUXIÈME SECTION DÉCISION Requête n o 45558/21 Bilal YILDIRIM

Gendarme Intelligence leader, revealed details of a contraguerilla undercover force and identified the leader of the contraguerilla force who killed the applicant's brother and Metin Can as Mahmut Yildrim

  Sinan YILDIRIM 94.   Ahmet Şerif KESKİN 95.   Teyfik KOÇ 96.   Gülten GİRGİN 1 97.   Sevim ÇAMLAR 1 98.   İlyas ÇAKAR 99.   Mustafa KÖROĞLU 100.

25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s995B5F3 { width:212.45pt; display:inline-block } .sA187A805 { width:199.62pt; display:inline-block }     QUATRIÈME SECTION     AFFAIRE HÜSEYİN YILDIRIM

xa0;      29181/09 11/05/2009 Tahir LAÇİN 01/03/1961 Ankara Yücel ONGUN 01/01/1979 Ankara Meriç SOLMAZ 01/01/1973 Ankara Deniz BAKIR 01/01/1979 Ankara İsmail KORKMAZ Ankara Ahmet YILDIRIM

    Moreover, it pursued the legitimate aim of preventing clandestine immigration and trafficking in human beings (see Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no.

  Paget-Lewis changea, par acte unilatéral, son nom pour celui de Paul Ahmet Yildirim Osman. Le 1 er mai 1987, M.

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }     TROISIÈME SECTION     AFFAIRE FEYZİ YILDIRIM

  22920/93, decision of 6 April 1994), as well as by the Court in the case of Yildirim v. Austria (application no. 34308/96, decision of 19   October 1999).

Türkiye 15/03/2018 Özay YILDIRIM 1983 Ankara Turkish Fatih DÖNMEZ 21. 19873/18 Kaplan v. Türkiye 11/04/2018 Mete KAPLAN 1988 Manisa Turkish   22. 21049/18 Kuş v.