It follows that he can not now claim to be the “victim” of a violation of the Convention as required by Article 34 of the Convention.

6 § 1 of the Convention.

  1 can be considered to have been “resolved” within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention.

34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the observations submitted by

    Other complaints Some applicants also raised additional complaints with reference to various Articles of the Convention and its Protocols.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L'ARTICLE 8 DE LA CONVENTION 28.

    The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 and Article 6   §   3   (d) of the Convention that they did not have a fair trial in criminal proceedings against them, in particular

They relied, in particular, on Article   10 of the Convention. 8.

court (in   cases nos. 8687/22 and 15928/22) ordered on various dates a one-month immediate break in the applicants’ judicial functions, pursuant to section 130(1) of the Act on the Organisation

    Remaining complaints Some applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

will become final in the circumstances set out in Article   44 §   2 of the Convention.

They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article   37 of the Convention.

The applicant finally complains under Article 6 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against him were unfair.

    En conclusion, la Cour juge le grief manifestement mal fondé et le rejette en application de l’article 35 §§ 3 et 4 de la Convention 78.

  40512/13, §§ 40-56, 22 October 2015). THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 33.

The newspapers were widely known for often publishing articles harshly criticising the Government and various public officials.

They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable

The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.