Paragraph 13 provides: “Adult competent patients have the right to decide how much weight to attach to the benefits, burdens, risks and the overall acceptability of any treatment.

  Burden et Burden c. Royaume-Uni (n° 13378/05) Les requérantes, J.M. et S.D.

as themselves, and thus stifled public debate, to require those who merely distributed a leaflet to bear the burden of establishing the truth of every statement contained in it.

  22531/05, 6   November 2007 and argued that they were made to bear an excessive individual burden.

  Mercredi 12 septembre 2007   Grande Chambre [1]   9 heures   Burden et Burden c.

2002 the Constitutional Court found that the rent-control scheme under both the   1994   Act and the 2001 Act was unconstitutional and that it had placed a disproportionate and excessive burden

THE UNITED KINGDOM   The European Court of Human Rights has today delivered at a public hearing its Grand Chamber judgment [1] in the case of Burden v. the United Kingdom (application no. 13378/05

Firstly, with regard to the accessibility of the remedy, the burden of proof incumbent on complainants did not appear to have been excessive.

The burden of proof could not properly be reversed as part of compensation proceedings brought following a final decision to discontinue criminal proceedings.

Did such deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on her?   3.

In particular, did the deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Gladysheva v. Russia , no. 7097/10, 6   December 2011)? 4a.

the requisite fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the applicant’s right of property, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden

Did such deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on her?

    If the interference was lawful, did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?

In particular, did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants (see Immobiliare Saffi v.

Did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicant company (see Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v.

Under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention the applicant complains that he had to bear the burden of proof as regards the lawful origin of his wealth, although by a decision of the Constitutional Court no.

In particular did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?   4.