Türkiye 18/06/2021 İsmail YILDIRIM 1974 Kocaeli Turkish Abdulkadir AKBAŞ Awarded 80. 40386/21 Güç v. Türkiye 02/08/2021 Oktay GÜÇ 1989 Amasya Turkish Muhammet Emin ÇITIR Awarded 81. 51294/21 Özkan v.

       On 14 April 1987, Paget-Lewis changed his name by deed-poll to Paul Ahmet Yildirim Osman.

  ALİ YILDIRIM 40.   ARMAĞAN JÜLİDE ÖNEL 41.   ASLAN TEKİN ÖNEL 42.   ATİKE SOLMAZ AY 43.   AYDAN HASÇİLİNGİR 44.   AYDIN KULTAŞ 45.   TUNA AK

inline-block } .sF2E32F9B { width:36.61pt; display:inline-block } .s5F32E900 { width:208.31pt; display:inline-block }       SECOND SECTION             CASE OF YILDIRIR

         8311/11 01/12/2010 Recep GÜL 01/02/1962 İzmir   Serkan CENGİZ             8314/11 01/12/2010 Fuat YILDIRIM

Others and Hazar , that period was about seven years; in Bulut and Yavuz it was about six years, while in other cases it ranged from three and a half years to one year and eight months (in Bayran and Yildirim

Maraş Adnan ARICA, born in 1980, lives in İzmir Hasan YILDIRIM, born in 1971, lives in Muğla Atay ATMACA, born in 1980, lives in Ankara Beşir AYLAK, born in 1972, lives in Diyarbakır Hasan RAZİ, born in

  Türkiye 14/08/2014 Oktay YILDIRIM 09/09/1980 Ankara Kamile KILDAN 50,000 2,000 legal services agreement 175 3,500 jointly awarded for lawyer’s fees in 4 applications as the same lawyer represented

  France (dec.), cited above; and Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no.   38602/02, ECHR 2003-IV). 37.

was about seven years; in Bulut and Yavuz it was about six years, while in other cases it ranged from three and a half years to one year and eight months (in Gojević ‑ Zrnić and Mančić and Yildirim

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s3133A7C8 { font-family:Arial; color:#0069d6 }       SECOND SECTION             CASE OF GÖKHAN YILDIRIM

Türkiye 03/02/2022 Muhammed YILDIRIM 1955 İstanbul Turkish 23. 8364/22 Mermer v. Türkiye 03/02/2022 Baki MERMER 1994 Konya Turkish 24. 8619/22 Altunay v.

  France (dec.), cited above, and Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no. 38602/02, ECHR 2003-IV). 36.     Furthermore, the lawful origin of the confiscated cash was not contested.

On the contrary, he could have proved his good faith, and that could have led to the restitution of his property (see, for instance and mutatis mutandis , Yildirim v.

the applicant is afforded an adequate opportunity to put his or her case to the responsible authorities in order to plead, as the case might be, illegality or arbitrary and unreasonable conduct (see Yildirim

margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline }     FIRST SECTION     CASE OF SELÇUK YILDIRIM

of the measure to which he was liable, an adequate opportunity to put his case to the responsible authorities, pleading, as the case might be, illegality or arbitrary and unreasonable conduct (see Yildirim

    Have the applicants complied with the six-month time-limit laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Bayram and Yildirim v.

whereby he or she is afforded an adequate opportunity to put his or her case to the responsible authorities in order to plead, as the case may be, illegality or arbitrary and unreasonable conduct (see Yildirim

  On 21 March 1994, the Bismil public prosecutor, Ridvan Yildirim, issued a decision of dismissal. The document identifies the complainant as the applicant and the victim as Üzeyir Kurt.