CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-211390
29 juin 2021
Au vu du préjudice subi par le requérant, la requête satisfait-elle à la condition de l’article 35 § 3 b) de la Convention ? 2.
Page 21 sur 799
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157312
24 août 2015
The applicant also complained under Article 34 of the Convention that the Colony no.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017JUD002569014
17 octobre 2024
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 16.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704DEC007591613
4 juillet 2017
Complaint under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention 50.
ECLI:CEDH:001-206530
9 novembre 2020
The applicant complains under Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0908DEC000935417
8 septembre 2022
The applicants’ other complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 6 of the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249836
24 mars 2026
These complaints – which fall under Article 18 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 11 – are raised with reference to Article 6 § 2, Articles 10, 11, 14 and/or 18 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0829DEC001722220
29 août 2023
17222/20) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 17 April 2020 by
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906DEC002691721
6 septembre 2022
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203DEC002299408
3 février 2015
1 of the Convention and also their right to property as provided by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520DEC004950417
20 mai 2021
The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.
ECLI:CEDH:001-168327
11 octobre 2016
34 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-184176
30 mai 2018
He invokes Articles 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention, Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0430JUD003549310
30 avril 2015
She relied on Articles 2, 6 and 13 of the Convention. 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219DEC001333609
19 décembre 2017
As to Article 13 of the Convention 30.
ECLI:CEDH:001-221131
25 octobre 2022
the Convention?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019DEC001457308
19 octobre 2017
The applicant’s complaints are therefore incompatible ratione materiae with Article 6 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD000744007
10 novembre 2022
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924DEC004121404
24 septembre 2019
They further submitted accessory complaints under Articles 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13 and 17 of the Convention, as well as Article 2 of Protocol No. 4. THE LAW 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0719JUD004913211
19 juillet 2016
juillet 2011 en vertu de l’article 34 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales (« la Convention »). 2.