CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD001178502
18 janvier 2007
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 13.
Page 22 sur 361
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD006649101
5 octobre 2006
Article was not expressly referred to. 48.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2142837-2291888
18 octobre 2007
It accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant EUR 1,500 for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 1,500 for costs and expenses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD003867706
24 avril 2014
In his application he invoked Article 6 of the Convention. 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD005775216
8 octobre 2019
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 69.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128JUD005414809
28 janvier 2014
Poland , no. 39430/04, § 55, 4 December 2012).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD000111502
10 mai 2007
Moldova , no. 53773/00, §§ 55 and 61, 13 June 2006). III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION IN RESPECT OF THE LENGTH OF THE PROCEEDUNGS FOLLOWING THEIR RE-OPENING 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD001507103
4 mars 2008
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD007357917
18 février 2020
The right to reimbursement of legal costs 34 . The Code of Civil Procedure reads: Article 98.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD001202710
10 juillet 2014
[it is] linked with the regular maintenance costs of the building.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016JUD003421607
16 octobre 2012
The applicant complained that the order to reimburse legal costs incurred by his opponent was in breach of his right to a fair hearing as guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention.
2ème Chambre
DTA_2300546_20250206
6 février 2025
Aux termes de l'article 13 du code général des impôts : " 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0509JUD000504607
9 mai 2019
of his costs incurred in the proceedings before the Court. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD003368105
21 juin 2011
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. II. ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 55.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD003237712
19 janvier 2017
AB, cited above , § 55; and Ouzounoglou v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0219JUD004950815
19 février 2026
public assembly) Article 6 § 1 (lack of a tribunal established by law) Article 13 (lack of effective remedies) 12,000 (non-pecuniary damage) 4,800 (costs and expenses for all the applicants
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211JUD007720916
11 février 2020
55747/16, § 55, 27 August 2019).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD002472004
26 juillet 2011
The Court considers that this complaint falls to be examined under Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC004138298
6 avril 2000
of the latter Article; the requirements of Article 13 are less strict than, and are absorbed by, those of Article 6 (the above-cited Airey judgment, p. 18, § 35).
Chambre 3
69e5747dcdc6046d47d89bc7
28 janvier 2025
RG 2024003329 Code N° 536 Tribunal de Commerce de LA ROCHE-SUR-YON Palais Consulaire - 55, rue Hoche - 85000 LA ROCHE SUR YON JUGEMENT AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE et ORDINAIRE du MARDI VINGT-HUIT JANVIER DEUX