CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 077 résultats pour « Frank WISMER Me »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9043

Admin. suprême

27 août 2013

27 août 2013

France (dec.) - 38275/10 Decision 27.8.2013 [Section V] Article 14 Discrimination Exclusion owing to date of birth from benefit of new rules governing the transmission of surnames: inadmissible  

Source officielle

Page 22 sur 154

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12007

Admin. suprême

22 février 2018

22 février 2018

France - 588/13 Judgment 22.2.2018 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Dismissal for using work computer to store large volume of pornographic material: no violation Facts – The

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC001143315

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2018

22 mai 2018

    La déclaration était ainsi libellée   : «   The Greek Government would wish to acknowledge - by way of a unilateral declaration – that the duration of the proceedings, in which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC003249603

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2008

21 octobre 2008

As regards the applicant's foreign currency savings On 8 August 1974 the applicant deposited 15,207.15 French Francs with the branch of the Yugoslav Investment Bank (“ Jugoslovenska investiciona banka

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC000602407

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

It has been the Court’s practice to strike applications out of the list of cases in the absence of any heir or close relative who has expressed the wish to pursue an application (see Léger v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216DEC007586012

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2014

16 décembre 2014

It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1(c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216DEC002383413

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2014

16 décembre 2014

It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1(c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208225

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2021

29 janvier 2021

In particular, did the applicant invoke before the Constitutional Court, at least in substance, the right on which she now wishes to rely before the Court (see, for example, Vučković and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3039

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

France - 65411/01 Judgment 9.11.2006 [Section III] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Independent tribunal Appointment to a key post in the Ministry responsible for mines of a member

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601DEC001765406

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2010

1 juin 2010

on 11 July 2006, Having regard to the friendly settlement signed by the parties, Having regard to Protocol No. 14, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr Franc

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321JUD005214212

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2017

21 mars 2017

    The Government did not oppose their wish. 25.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3123830-3463658

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2010

11 mai 2010

France (application no. 29784/06)     CONVICTION OF TOWN COUNCILLOR FOR UNDULY ACCUSING TOWN’s MAYOR OF CRIMINAL OFFENCES DID NOT BREACH HIS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION   Unanimously:   No

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55734

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1999

8 octobre 1999

in respect of pecuniary damage; 30   000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage; 5   185 French francs in respect of costs and expenses and that simple interest at an annual rate of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608JUD000344102

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2010

8 juin 2010

In that case the Court allowed the Government's request for revision of the judgment but, having regard to the fact that the applicant had died during the proceedings and no relatives expressed the wish

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12849

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2020

11 juin 2020

France - 15271/16, 15280/16, 15282/16 et al.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0708JUD004220207

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2010

8 juillet 2010

    In a fax dated 10 September 2007 to the Greek Ambassador in France, the applicants, as permanent residents in France, expressed the wish to exercise their voting rights in France in the elections

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC000512709

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2010

11 mai 2010

The declaration provided as follows: “...The Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration – its acknowledgement that the length of the civil proceedings in the present case

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0521DEC000428210

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2013

21 mai 2013

that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37   §   1   (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC000951708

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2013

28 mai 2013

France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02, § 44, 30 March 2009, with further references).

Source officielle
CA

1ère Chambre

69e9b018cdc6046d473822fd

Appel

21 avril 2026

21 avril 2026

Monsieur Philippe MAUREL et Mme Anne-Sophie WILLM, Conseillers. M.

Source officielle