Those statements could not be interpreted as declaring the applicant guilty. The conclusion reached by the Constitutional Court confirmed that position. 44.

; Attendu que la société Transports Guillot fait grief au jugement de l'avoir condamnée à payer à M.

[N] Défendeur : la société Benoît Guillon Requête n° : 983/22 Ordonnance n° : 90439 du 6 avril 2023 ORDONNANCE _______________ ENTRE : la société Benoît Guillon, ayant la SCP

Guen " a demandé au tribunal administratif de Rennes d'annuler pour excès de pouvoir l'arrêté du 24 août 2017, tel que modifié par arrêté du 19 septembre 2018, par lequel le maire de Saint-Cast-le-Guildo

A C, représenté par Me Lisa Guillet, demande au tribunal : 1°) de condamner l'Etat (préfecture du Val-de-Marne) à lui verser la somme de 10 000 euros en réparation des préjudices qu'il estime avoir subis

l'arrêt attaqué (Rennes, 10 janvier 2012), que la société Banque CIC Ouest (la banque) a, le 16 décembre 2002, donné mandat à la SCP Rochard et Cesbron aux droits de laquelle vient la SCP Rochard et Guillou

le jugement du 27 avril 1993 par lequel le tribunal administratif de Rennes a rejeté sa demande tendant à l'annulation de la délibération du 10 septembre 1988 du conseil municipal de Saint-Cast-Le-Guildo

Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Disciplinary penalty imposed on doctor for criticising fellow practitioner in report to a patient: violation   Facts : The applicant, a consultant, was found guilty

On 31 May 2007 the applicant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to ten months’ imprisonment, suspended for three years, but this judgment was quashed on appeal on 29 January 2008.

    Minor-Offences proceedings On 4 June 2007 the Labin Minor-Offences Court found the applicant guilty of physically attacking a football judge, one I.R., during a football match in Viškovići

On 18   August 2009 the Erzurum Assize Court with special jurisdiction found the applicant guilty of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation and sentenced him to four terms

He had not pleaded guilty and he had been part of a criminal enterprise. The applicant filed an appeal.

  6 of Pervouralsk found the applicant guilty of having made a death threat to A. and having caused bodily injuries to A. The court gave the applicant a 2.5   years’ suspended sentence.

On 29 February 2012 the Buzet Police Station ( Policijska uprava istarska, Policijska postaja Buzet ) issued a penalty notice, having found the applicant guilty of several minor road traffic offences.

On 23 November 2005 the Zagreb Minor Offences Court ( Prekršajni sud u Zagrebu ) found the applicant guilty on charges of minor offence of family violence for having verbally abused and assaulted his wife

On 27 June 2012 the Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Lviv found I.V. guilty of inflicting minor bodily injuries on the applicant in respect of one episode of 14 January 2010, sentenced him to one hundred

    alleged violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention), to be presumed innocent until proved guilty (Article 6 § 2 of the Convention) and to respect

Relying in particular on a record drawn up on the basis of the two witness statements in question, the National Security Court found the applicant guilty of secessionist acts, considered it established

In the criminal proceedings the applicant was found guilty of causing a road traffic accident in which one person had lost her life.

) and to respect for his private life (Article 8 of the Convention) on account of a statement made by a court in the course of inheritance proceedings that the applicant was guilty of a   crime for