CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0303DEC001855920
3 mars 2026
They therefore fall outside the scope of the case as it stands (see Kulák v. Slovakia , no.   57748/21, § 52, 3 April 2025).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0224JUD002380603
24 février 2009
respect for the reputation and rights of others, he or she is allowed to have recourse to a degree of exaggeration or even provocation, or in other words to make somewhat immoderate statements (see Kuliś
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1796682-1890914
3 octobre 2006
Poland (no. 3501/02) Kuril v. Slovakia (no. 63959/00)     ***   These summaries by the Registry do not bind the Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0321JUD002681516
21 mars 2024
xa0;   First medical examinations conducted two days after the applicant’s release; no conclusive evidence indicating that injuries were sustained under police control (for relevant examples, see Kulyk
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127JUD005783709
27 novembre 2018
  7025/04, §§ 74 and 79, 24 September 2009, and Kulik v.   Ukraine [Committee], no. 34515/04, §§ 186-87, 2 February 2017). 47.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619JUD002637116
19 juin 2025
  10493/12 , §   45, 27   November   2014; Kulik v.   Ukraine , no.   10397/10 , §   59, 19   March   2015; and Yaroshovets and Others v. Ukraine , nos.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC001834208
4 janvier 2012
Kulig, a lawyer practising in Warsaw.   The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. A.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2600674-2829216
13 janvier 2009
Finland (no. 47628/06) Arkadiusz Kubik v. Poland (no. 45097/05) Górkiewicz v. Poland (no. 41663/04) Kliber v. Poland (no. 11522/03) Makuszewski v. Poland (no. 35556/05) Pelizg v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD003832814
2 mars 2023
  10493/12, §   45, 27   November 2014; Kulik v. Ukraine , no.   10397/10, §   59, 19   March 2015; and Yaroshovets and Others v. Ukraine , nos.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223789
privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, passive smoking     26603/18* 29/10/2018 Yevgeniy Sergeyevich KULIK
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-80193
4 avril 2007
05/10/04 W.M., arrêt du 14/01/03 Krzak, arrêt du 06/04/04 W.Z., arrêt du 24/10/02 Krzewicki, arrêt du 27/04/04 Wasilewski, arrêt du 21/12/00 Kubiszyn, arrêt du 30/01/03 Wiatrzyk, arrêt du 26/10/04 Kusiak
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602JUD007183101
2 juin 2009
    Le 18 mars 1954, Konstantin Kosta, mandataire de la famille (paragraphe 8 ci-dessus), donna pouvoir à un certain Kulidi Laskari.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD004167018
14 septembre 2023
exercise in fresh air, overcrowding Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 12,500     42038/18 16/08/2018 Vitaliy Mikhaylovich KULISH
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1110JUD000160262
10 novembre 1969
Le Juge d’instruction l’interrogea ensuite sur un acte d’escroquerie qualifiée concernant Gertrude Kucik. 9. Après son élargissement en avril 1958, Stögmüller avait continué de gérer son affaire.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209JUD001197603
9 décembre 2008
seriously hamper the contribution of the press to the discussion of matters of public interest, and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so (see, for example, Kuliś
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0923JUD006040800
23 septembre 2004
    The applicant’s father was subjected to repression in 1929-1930 as a rich peasant (“ kulak ”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122JUD007206810
22 janvier 2019
attention du public et s’est engagée elle-même dans le débat public par ses déclarations à la presse, les limites de la critique admissible étaient plus larges à son égard que pour un simple individu ( Kuliś
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419JUD000277009
19 avril 2016
Turquie , n o 41844/09, § 36, 17 septembre 2013 et Kulic c.   Ukraine , n o 10397/10, § 45, 19 mars 2015). 91.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0528JUD002151223
28 mai 2026
Autriche , n o 13071/03, § 49, 2   novembre 2006   ; Kuliś et Różycki c. Pologne , n o   27209/03, § 37, 6   octobre   2009).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003965603
critical comment are wider if a public figure is involved, as he or she is inevitably and knowingly exposed to public scrutiny and must therefore display a particularly high degree of tolerance (see Kuliś
Page 22 sur 25