The invention had thus had no greater value for the company.

The first applicant would thus replace the second applicant’s father.

In this connection they point out that in the present case, the military judge sitting on the bench of the Erzurum State Security Court was replaced by a civilian judge when the applicants' lawyer made

The reform of this system resulted in the impairment of the essence of their right to receive a pension.

Constitutional Court observed that the applicant partnership had failed to raise this constitutional question before the lower courts, thus failing to comply with the principle of subsidiarity.

They allege that during an operation of the Turkish army in the hills surrounding their village in April 1995, whilst they were out shepherding, they came across Turkish soldiers who ill-treated them and

In this respect, they invoke Article 6 of the Convention.   3.

They thus had close professional and private ties with the countries where they wished to stay for a visit or to reside.

They further requested the Court to strike out the application in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.

They claim that at least 21 wings out of 30 in the eight H Blocks of HM Prison Maze have been segregated.   They maintain that they are thus the victims of discrimination.

  They also complain that, by denying the first applicant's deputy access to the court room, the Juvenile Judge hindered the effective exercise of legal assistance and thus denied the second applicant

It further observes that they were based on Article 823 § 1 in conjunction with Article 1004 of the Civil Code and were thus “prescribed by law” and that they were aimed at protecting the physician’s personality

the President of this court.

Moreover, the applicants had received fair compensation since they had obtained the entire sum they had asked for.

On 1 April 2010 the second applicant, also on behalf of the first applicant, appealed this decision and requested a provisional measure to the effect that they would not be expelled for the duration of

Thus, the total amount of rent for the applicants’ share of the property according to the Government would amount to EUR 29,200.

This decision was upheld by the chief prosecutor of the same office and then by a District Court.

outside their own jurisdiction), not only that the French courts declared that they had jurisdiction to try the case, but also that they would apply French law.

In this light, the applicants also invoked Article 14 complaining further that they received such a treatment only because they did not share the same political opinion as the party in Government at the

They had opted for an education that was tailored to his needs, in a specialised setting. This strategy had been satisfactory for the child’s father, who had custody of E.