CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

7 489 résultats pour « Buresen »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234429

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2024

21 mai 2024

commissioned an expert report and requested documents from other State bodies; summarised the parties’ factual statements, indicating the uncontested facts; instructed each party on their respective burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243543

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2025

6 mai 2025

Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, for general principles, Karahasanoğlu v. Turkey , nos. 21392/08 and 2 others, §§ 142-52; see also Filkin v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249360

Admin. suprême

24 février 2026

24 février 2026

The applicant company then failed to satisfy the burden of proof in relation to the changed date.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244521

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

    Has that interference been in the public interest and in accordance with the conditions provided for by law and did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant within the meaning

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187171

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2018

26 septembre 2018

; Did that deprivation and the Court of Cassation’s interpretation of Article   35 of the Expropriation Act, as noted in its decision dated 29   March 2007, impose an excessive individual burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-197199

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2019

2 octobre 2019

In particular, did the fact that the applicants were ordered to pay attorney fees to the expropriating public authority constitute an excessive burden which upset the fair balance which must be struck

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174000

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

Did such deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant   ?   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC006584009

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2011

28 juin 2011

Autriche (déc.), n o 45330/99, 22   novembre   2001   ;   Burden c. Royaume-Uni [GC], n o 13378/05, § 35, CEDH 2008 ‑ ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203DEC001953416

Admin. suprême

3 février 2022

3 février 2022

It followed from the EC Decision that compensatory measures mitigating distortions of competition and strengthening burden sharing were necessary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1115JUD003112996

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2002

15 novembre 2002

    The applicant contended that the interference was disproportionate in view of its length and of the financial burden that resulted from not being able to increase the rent.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:003-1747578-1852134

Admin. suprême

28 août 2006

28 août 2006

            Mardi 12 septembre 2006   Chambre   Audience sur la recevabilité et le fond 9 h 30   Burden c.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12791

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2020

17 mars 2020

Law – Article 35 § 1: The Court was satisfied that the procedural requirements of access to the compensatory scheme were simple and accessible and did not excessively burden claimants either procedurally

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13049

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2020

24 novembre 2020

Although this specific deprivation was not based on a legitimate public-interest ground, the individual concerned could be made to bear an additional burden, incompatible with Article   1 of Protocol

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10489

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

As to whether this retrospective application had imposed an excessive burden on the applicants, it was to be noted that the contested Protocol had been enacted in the context of a longstanding and close

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13905

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2022

29 novembre 2022

  There was nothing in the   applicant’s behaviour to justify that the   burden of the consequences of that uncertainty   should be placed   on   him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12161

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2018

23 octobre 2018

such circumstances, both States and the Court in its supervisory role had to be vigilant to ensure that measures, such as the one at issue, did not give rise to an imbalance that imposed an excessive burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13659

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2022

12 mai 2022

It had thus constituted a significant financial burden even for the average citizen, let alone the applicant whose monthly income had consisted of the equivalent of EUR 164 in disability benefits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229667

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2023

24 novembre 2023

Did the interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V?   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512DEC001560607

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2009

12 mai 2009

Furthermore, he had been faced with an unsurmountable burden of proof. 3.

Source officielle
TJ

8ème chambre 3ème section

678172e86d34da2cbdcda205

T. Judiciaire

10 janvier 2025

10 janvier 2025

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE PARIS [1] [1] Copies exécutoires délivrées le: à Me BURESI Copies certifiées conformes délivrées le: à Me ROBIN ■ 8ème chambre 3ème section N° RG 22/03595 N° Portalis 352J-W-B7G-CWCFN

Source officielle

Page 23 sur 375

← PrécédentSuivant →