CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC002817405
1 octobre 2013
On 10 January 2011 the Bulgarian Government informed the Court that they did not wish to exercise their right to intervene in the first case.
Page 23 sur 154
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC003915006
29 septembre 2009
The Government hereby wish to express – by way of a unilateral declaration – their acknowledgement of the fact that the applicant’s pre-trail detention was not compatible with a ‘reasonable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC000133909
30 mars 2010
The Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration – their acknowledgement of the unreasonable duration of the domestic proceedings in which the applicants were involved.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC000706811
27 janvier 2015
It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC000855309
14 décembre 2010
The declaration provided as follows: “(...) the Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration – their acknowledgement of the infringement of the applicant’s right of access to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512DEC002264505
12 mai 2009
The declaration provided as follows: “(...) the Government hereby wish to express - by way of the unilateral declaration — its acknowledgement of the unreasonable duration of the domestic proceedings in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC003048609
The declaration provided as follows: “...The Government hereby wish to express – by way of the unilateral declaration – its acknowledgement of the excessive length of the applicant’s proceedings within
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC004933507
14 janvier 2014
Should you not wish to avail yourself of the opportunity to reply to the Government’s observations and to submit compensation claims under Article 41, you must inform the Court of this within the same
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD005467300
2 février 2006
On 6 April 2004 his wife and children expressed their wish to continue the application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0105DEC005509810
5 janvier 2016
On 11 October 2014 the second applicant expressed her wish to pursue the proceedings lodged with the Court by the first applicant. 3.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0418JUD006512819
18 avril 2023
The Court observes that the applicant did not wish to undergo such surgery and invoked, in substance, before both the domestic courts and the Court, her right to self-determination. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915DEC006897801
15 septembre 2009
In his reply the applicant contested the conditions proposed by the Government and expressed his wish that the examination of his application be continued.
Chambre sociale-2ème sect
62c7cab3cb8dca058e3e7d29
7 juillet 2022
CROWN BEVCAN FRANCE prise en la personne de son représentant légal pour ce domicilié audit siège [Adresse 4] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Valérie BACH-WASSERMANN, avocat au barreau de NANCY substituée
Pôle 1 - Chambre 1
6160964f41ad74d62c1818a8
14 octobre 2014
COLOMBUS HOLDINGS FRANCE 'CHF' prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux [Adresse 2] [Localité 2] représentée par Me Philippe GALLAND de la SCP GALLAND-VIGNES, avocat postulant du barreau
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3197854-3557609
8 juillet 2010
In a fax dated 10 September 2007 to the Greek Ambassador in France, the applicants, being permanent residents in France, expressed the wish to exercise their voting rights in France for the Greek
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419
14 septembre 2022
Repatriations by France 26 .
1ère Chambre
6628a173b2cb67000826a4c7
23 avril 2024
La société Hags France a quitté les lieux le 29 juillet 2021.
65b0b9b08d0ccf000877e46f
23 janvier 2024
Cédric SAUNIER et Madame Anne-Sophie WILLM, Conseillers. Greffier : Mme Fabienne ARNOUX, Greffier, lors des débats et du prononcé de la décision.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC003686597
22 octobre 1997
If his wife did not wish to leave Switzerland, she was free to visit her husband in Yugoslavia; it was also not excluded that his prohibition to enter Switzerland could be temporarily suspended
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917DEC004113514
17 septembre 2019
Ms Trenina submitted that the applicant’s representatives maintain contact with his wife, Ms Nodira Pulatzhonovna Azimova, who wishes to pursue the application in his interests. B.