His father lived with his partner at the latter’s residence. The applicant’s brother had a family of his own.

    On 24 and 26 March 1997 the applicant’s lawyer reiterated his request for a medical examination of his client.

What we do know is that after he saw his solicitor he repeated his account of his criminal activities and went so far as to sign the notes.”

On 23 February 2006 the judge gave his reasons for his decision not to include the confessions made in the United Kingdom.

in the maintenance of a parental relationship violated his rights to the enjoyment of his family life as guaranteed by Article 6 § 2 (1) of the Basic Law ( Grundgesetz ).

  The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention of a violation of his right to respect for his private life and his home.

his detention and his alleged beating by the SIZO no. 3 guards on 24 August 2006.

After he had fallen to the ground they had twisted his hands behind his back and handcuffed him.

He complains that these conditions breached the presumption of innocence and render him a prisoner in his own country.

The insurance company rejected his application for the reason that his working capacity was reduced by less than 10 %.

Given the pitiable state of his inheritance, Mr Gâtlan has his eye on a roadside property in the municipality of Gearmata.

co ‑ defendant whose evidence was decisive for his conviction.

    In his application, the applicant maintained that both he and his co ‑ accused had been heard by the Supreme Court.

By rejecting his intervention, the Court of Appeal violated his rights under Article 6 of the Convention.

A.P. was found to be positively involved and interested in his parental role, without limitation of his parental skills. 3.

The Court of Appeal rejected the appeals of the applicant and his co-defendants on three occasions.

the boy to his family.

In June 2021, however, the head of the Migration Department of the Sofia branch of the Ministry of the Interior revoked his permit, alleging links to terrorist activities.

under a positive duty, notwithstanding his failure to make a request, to ensure his presence in court in such circumstances.