frères SA (la société Castel) a été condamnée à payer à M.

A hearing was held on 24 March 1999.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

According to the reports available in the file, the initial medical examination carried out at the time of recruitment might not have been sufficient to reach a diagnosis of scoliosis, particularly as

The search was carried out on 15 March 2017 in investigation proceedings targeting the Audi stock corporation for fraud related to the use of unauthorised emissions control devices in diesel vehicles.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

2026   SECOND SECTION Application no. 35672/19 Osman KANDEMİR against Türkiye and 4 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 12 February 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications

March 1998 as a result of the statutory ban laid down in section   31 of Law no.

(xi)   Bakırköy public prosecutor's decision to transfer the case file to Yığılca public prosecutor's office, dated 17 March 1995.

Sibiu Prosecutor’s Office for the entire criminal investigation of the case to be carried out again.

    A forensic examination of the body of A.B., the third applicant’s son, was carried out on 27 March 2006.

In the case of Taziyeva and Others v.

The applicant requested that Mr Nazarenko and Mr Koshelev, who had carried out the expert assessment in the case in 2000, be examined by a trial court.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

On 21 March 2008 the Izmir Cadastral Court dismissed the case in line with the findings of the last cadastral work, concluding that the impugned plots had been registered to the Treasury due to the applicant

The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

In the application form which followed, section   1 carried the name of the publishing house and section   2 carried the name of the newspaper.

On one occasion in March 2006 he was summoned to Zavodskoy District Prosecutor’s Office and he was informed that the investigation had been resumed but was not given access to the case file.