Similarly, a man who failed to apply within the time-limits as they applied to women could not, in most cases, claim to be a victim of discrimination, since a woman in the same position would not have

His claim for widows’ benefits was made in June 2000 and was rejected on 15 June 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

Of those, 2,300 had been staying in woodland outside the RIC’s official perimeter.

Monsieur [Y] [F] Chez Mme [U] [F] [Adresse 4] [Localité 2] Représenté par Me Mickaël ANDRIEUX de la SCP INTER BARREAUX SCHOEMAECKER ANDRIEUX, avocat au barreau de LILLE substitué par Me Georgina WOIMANT

Procédure devant la Cour : Par une requête, enregistrée le 22 juillet 2021, et un mémoire enregistré le 10 mars 2023, la société SCPA, représentée par Me Woimant, demande à la Cour : 1°) d'annuler

Par un mémoire en défense enregistré le 9 octobre 2020, la commune du Puy-Sainte-Réparade, représentée par Me Woimant, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce que la somme de 1500 euros soit mise à la charge

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme B, - et les observations de Me Woimant, substituant Me Soubeiga, représentant Mme A. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

A..., représenté par Me Woimant, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler la décision implicite du 17 mai 2023 par laquelle la présidente de la métropole a refusé sa demande de modification du plan local

In September 2002 a woman from the applicant’s village disappeared. Her dead body was found several days later in a well.

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 28   April   2000 and was rejected on 8 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

the local council as a whole: violation Facts – The applicant was sentenced to a criminal fine on a charge of aggravated defamation for damaging the honour and reputation of Ms E.G., the “right-hand woman

seven different departments of the Register Office, all of which were rejected on the grounds that the Constitution and the Family Code of Ukraine explicitly defined marriage as a family union between a woman

Subsequently, the applicant had met another woman. In May 2009 he had informed D. that he had fallen in love with someone else. 13.

The applicant’s challenge on gender discrimination grounds, the law making no provision for a similar restriction where the beneficiary was a woman, was unsuccessful.

  In particular, if it is to be assumed that the applicant, a single woman with a daughter born out of wedlock in Europe, must be regarded as capable of protecting her daughter against FGM, on the

On 26 July 2008 the applicant, inebriated, allegedly publicly insulted a woman with a child. The police arrived and arrested the applicant using, what appeared to be, excessive force.

In 2014 the applicant married to a Georgian woman with whom he had two children, born in 2013 and 2019. They both have the Georgian nationality.

        The applicant complains that the United Kingdom fail to recognise her rights as a woman.

Similarly, a man who failed to apply within the time-limits as they applied to a woman claimant could not, in most cases, claim to be a victim of discrimination, since a woman in the same position would

On 14 November 2000 the Inland Revenue informed him that he was ineligible for WBA as he was not a woman.