Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Chelu v.

Ž.M. did not know who might have killed P.M. 13.

On 11 April 2009 the applicant made an attempt to travel from Romania to Moldova with his residence permit but was refused entry on Moldovan territory on the ground that he did not have a visa.

All applicants have been released from prison. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

All applicants have been released from prison. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

All applicants have been released from prison. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

remedies for the complaints about the inadequate conditions of their detention, as the action in tort had become an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have

necessary work, and that a further sum of USD 3,746 (at the annual rate of 14%) should be deducted for the taxes that the applicant should have paid on rental revenue.

Background facts The applicant was, at the material time, a Lieutenant in the Queen Alexandra's Royal Army.

During the first two days of his detention he had been beaten and threatened to have his right arm cut off because he had a cross tattooed under his wrist. He was forced to convert to Islam.

It sought to have decisions nos. 9 and 10 of 21 and 22 July 1999 (see paragraphs 17 and 18 above) set aside.

Article 117 § 3 “Public or private forests or forest areas which have been destroyed or are being destroyed by fire or have otherwise been deforested or are being deforested, shall not thereby relinquish

The Court observes that the domestic courts have acknowledged the violation and awarded EUR 500,000 in compensation for pecuniary damage and EUR 10,000 in non ‑ pecuniary damage.

    The applicant did not have the relevant qualification when she got promoted, as she had failed the relevant exam. 6.

have taken part in the voting.”

Grèce (requêtes n o 63000/00, 74291/01 et 74292/01) Violations de l’article 6 § 1 Le requérant, Alexandros Skondrianos, est un ressortissant grec.

She instituted administrative proceedings to have the plan amended.

This amount would have been “dramatically reduced” following the denomination on 1 January 1998, with one new rouble equalling 1,000 old roubles.

He sought to have the search declared unlawful. 8.     On 4   November 2004 the District Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint.