CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD006908614
17 janvier 2023
These replies did not refer to any medical assistance related to HCV. 13.
Page 24 sur 57
Cour d'Appel
6253cc36bd3db21cbdd8f7cd
31 mai 2012
DOUAI CHAMBRE 7 SECTION 2 ARRÊT DU 31/ 05/ 2012 No MINUTE : 12/ 458 No RG : 10/ 09075 Jugement (No 10/ 00128) rendu le 13 Décembre 2010 par le Juge aux affaires familiales de BOULOGNE SUR MER REF
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233565
16 avril 2024
Türkiye 20/10/2021 Şenol KUŞ 1987 Antalya Turkish Hasan Hüseyin COŞKUN 17. 52694/21 Ataş v. Türkiye 25/10/2021 Fuat ATAŞ 1973 Samsun Turkish Ekrem KAYA 18. 52996/21 Yolcu v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630DEC001196712
30 juin 2020
Elle estima que le tribunal militaire avait statué à bon droit en relaxant F.E. en application de l’adage in dubio pro reo . L’action en indemnisation 43.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317JUD005847317
17 mars 2026
Türkiye 23/11/2018 Hayati BÖYÜKATA 1976 Ankara Turkish Osman BERGİN 1661/19 Kazan v. Türkiye 17/12/2018 Eşref KAZAN 1963 Kocaeli Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 2717/19 Yüce v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC001298604
6 décembre 2011
La Cour fédérale de justice a exposé que l’obligation de l’Etat, prévue aux articles 2 § 1 et 92 de la Loi fondamentale, de garantir que toute question juridique régie par le droit étatique fût soumise
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD003092110
5 juin 2018
In so far as the Government refer to Article 422 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is noted that this provision refers only to decisions adopted by a court of appeal acting as a second-instance court
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1673406-1753592
23 mai 2006
Hasan Ceylan v. Turkey (no. 58398/00) Violation of Article 5 § 3 The applicant, Hasan Ceylan, is a Turkish national who was born in 1964 and lives in Istanbul.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1210JUD003475312
10 décembre 2015
The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kud ła v. Poland [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1210JUD002921313
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD007386410
6 octobre 2016
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Helena Jäderblom, President, Dmitry Dedov, Branko Lubarda, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0212JUD000633811
12 février 2019
The Court of Appeal did respond to the objection raised by the applicant and, after re-examining the merits of the case, dismissed the applicant’s action against the defendant company.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD005467512
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0115DEC000815213
15 janvier 2019
composed of: Robert Spano, President, Işıl Karakaş, Julia Laffranque, Valeriu Griţco, Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, Ivana Jelić, Arnfinn Bårdsen, judges, and Hasan
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC006300112
21 novembre 2017
Rights (Second Section), sitting on 21 November 2017 as a Committee composed of: Julia Laffranque, President, Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges, and Hasan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0218JUD005010913
18 février 2016
The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kud ła v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD003612514
5 juillet 2016
The Court refers to the relevant material cited in its previous case ‑ law concerning the Republic of Moldova (see, for instance, Shishanov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD004769610
24 novembre 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1201JUD004681509
1 décembre 2016
In view of the foregoing, the Court considers that in the circumstances of the present case the book value is not the correct basis to rely on when calculating the applicant’s pecuniary loss. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC003201509
22 janvier 2019
The expression “in accordance with the law” refers to the quality of the legislation in question.