It accordingly held that there was no need to examine that complaint.

It further held that it was not necessary to examine the applicant’s complaint under Article   5 §   4.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4 (right to liberty and security) and awarded her 4,000 Swiss francs (CHF) for costs and expenses and dismissed the remainder of

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3, given the authorities’ failure to investigate Ms Veznedaroğlu’s torture allegations, and awarded her 2,000 US Dollars for

, by sixteen votes to four, that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held, unanimously, that the finding of a violation constituted sufficient just satisfaction in

It also held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in all the cases.

That assistance was not provided in addition to any care dispensed by health care professionals, and the prisoner assigned to help the applicant had not received the training required to assist a person

  The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.

A public chamber hearing was held at the Human Rights Building in Strasbourg on 16 December 2003.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

  The Court held that there had been violations of Articles 6 § 1 and 10.

  The Court further held, unanimously, that the question of the application of Article 41 (just satisfaction) was not ready for decision. (The judgment is available only in English.)   1.

It therefore held, unanimously, that, in the case of B. , there had been no violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d)of the Convention.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   5 § 4 and also awarded Mr   Pyrak EUR   2,500 for non-pecuniary damage.

(Estonian), Renate Jaeger (German) and Volodymyr   Butkevych (Ukrainian) – took evidence from witnesses in Khmelnytsky (Ukraine) from Monday 25 to Wednesday 27 June 2007 in Izyaslav Prison and held

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

Poland judgment, the Court held that Poland was to take steps to ensure Bug River claimants in general were properly compensated as well as finding that there had been a violation of Article   1 of

que l'examen des pièces versées aux débats montre que le 17 décembre 1997, date de la plainte avec constitution de partie civile de la SNC Butagaz devant le doyen des juges d'instruction d'Avesnes-Sur-Helpe