CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC002708395
21 mai 1997
Both the applicant and the public prosecutor filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal (Gerechtshof) of The Hague.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD001376415
8 octobre 2019
The defence sought an adjournment, asking the judge to assist the defence in obtaining a copy of the street security-camera footage, which arguably might have been exculpating or have clarified pertinent
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC005724909
4 janvier 2012
It is therefore from this date at the latest that the applicant must be considered to have been directly affected by the investigations and consequently to have been charged with a criminal offence in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD001035509
28 janvier 2020
(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him ...” Admissibility 23.
CHAMBRE 7 SECTION 1
60327ac4070494aeb1c1bb3a
25 janvier 2018
Juge aux affaires familiales de VALENCIENNES APPELANT Monsieur [B] [B] né le [Date naissance 1] 1934 à [Localité 1] (MAROC) [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] Représenté par Me Julie CAMBIER de la SCP
2e chambre de la famille
64eedc5ebb2c32d969d35234
10 août 2023
[T] [X] [L] épouse [B] née le 20 Septembre 1947 à [Localité 6] (13) de nationalité Française et Américaine [Adresse 1], VIRGINIE (ETATS UNIS) Représentée par Me Célia VILANOVA substituant Me Philippe
Service des Référés
6791dfef1c87724b5e69d8b3
22 janvier 2025
Madame [M] [S] épouse [C] née le 31 mai 1965 à [Localité 8] de nationalité française [Adresse 4] [Localité 5] représentée par Me Isabelle ALVES, avocat au barreau de GRENOBLE substituant Me Philippe
CHAMBRE 1 SECTION 2
603309c8aafc937c13f7ecf2
12 octobre 2017
[O] [E] né le [Date naissance 1] 1941 à [Localité 1] demeurant [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représenté et assisté par Me Jean-Philippe Verague, avocat au barreau d'Arras, substitué à l'audience par
civ1
613723a9cd5801467740c9e3
13 février 2001
Paul K..., demeurant Le Mont des Haies, 08220 Saint-Jean aux Bois, 39 / M. Michel L..., demeurant 08310 Bignicourt, 40 / M. Frédéric P..., demeurant Ferme d'Ecogne, 08090 Fagnon, 41 / M.
Cour d'Appel
6253cae6bd3db21cbdd8c6bc
29 octobre 2008
représenté par la SCP SIDER, avoués à la Cour, ayant Me Philippe HAGE, avocat au barreau d'AIX EN PROVENCE INTIMES Monsieur René Y... demeurant ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC004205204
2 novembre 2010
The Court therefore concludes that failure by legal-aid counsel to provide effective representation cannot be said either to have been manifest or to have been sufficiently brought to the appeal court’
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111560
15 septembre 2009
The majority in that case erred in interpreting Article 6 § 1 in light of the relevant rules of international law and so to have limited the effect of Article 6 § 1 because of the scope of the international
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD001927308
25 février 2020
Remember that there is a real threat of United Russia’s total dominance and we have seen it blossom.” 16.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC004372617
11 février 2020
All other midwives refusing a part of the work on any other grounds would have been treated the same way as the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC003349996
7 juin 2001
Granting the right to reply would not have unnecessarily prolonged the proceedings before the Federal Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305JUD000212010
5 mars 2019
The Court is therefore not convinced that an appeal to a court by the applicant, which could only have had the same effect, that is the annulment of a refusal to institute criminal proceedings, would have
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD004705611
21 novembre 2017
The applicants replied that when they lodged their application with the Court in May 2011 they could not reasonably have expected that new cassation appeal procedure would have been an effective
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:C210660
4 octobre 2018
Besson, conseiller, Mme Mainardi, greffier de chambre ; Vu les observations écrites de la SCP Boré, Salve de Bruneton et Mégret, avocat de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601DEC004090805
1 juin 2010
For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to adjourn the examination of the applicant's complaints concerning the scope of judicial review in the proceedings following his dismissal, the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022JUD006635511
22 octobre 2019
Having regard to the nature and scope of the violation found, the Court awards the applicant EUR 1,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable. B.
Page 24 sur 50